AP Lang CA2 Practice

AP Lang CA2 Practice

11th Grade

11 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

argumentative text

argumentative text

9th - 12th Grade

10 Qs

ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION

ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION

11th Grade

10 Qs

Rogerian Argument

Rogerian Argument

9th Grade - University

11 Qs

Analytical Exposition Text

Analytical Exposition Text

11th Grade

10 Qs

Analytical Exposition

Analytical Exposition

11th Grade

10 Qs

Toulmin Model of Argumentation

Toulmin Model of Argumentation

11th Grade - University

15 Qs

Rogerian

Rogerian

9th Grade - University

11 Qs

Rogerian Argument

Rogerian Argument

University

15 Qs

AP Lang CA2 Practice

AP Lang CA2 Practice

Assessment

Quiz

English

11th Grade

Easy

CCSS
RI.11-12.5, W.11-12.1, W.11-12.1A

+6

Standards-aligned

Created by

Petra Engisch

Used 1+ times

FREE Resource

11 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which of the following is a key difference between Aristotelian and Rogerian arguments?

Aristotelian arguments rely on ethos, pathos, and logos, while Rogerian arguments focus solely on logos.

Aristotelian arguments aim to defeat an opponent, while Rogerian arguments seek common ground.

Aristotelian arguments are more formal, while Rogerian arguments are more informal.

Aristotelian arguments are inductive, while Rogerian arguments are deductive.

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

2.

DRAG AND DROP QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In the Toulmin model, a warrant is (a)  

A statement of fact or opinion.
A general principle or rule that ex
A counterargument to the main claim
A specific example or detail that s

3.

MATCH QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Match the following statements with their characteristics:

A statement that is not supported by factual information.

Specific and debatable.

A statement that relies on feelings rather than facts.

Emotionally charged and subjective.

A statement that lacks clarity and can be interpreted in multiple ways.

Based on personal opinion rather than evidence.

A statement that is clear, precise, and can be argued for or against.

Vague and open-ended.

Tags

CCSS.W.11-12.1

CCSS.W.11-12.1B

4.

MATCH QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Match the following types of reasoning with their descriptions.

Reasoning that involves drawing conclusions from two or more premises.

Syllogistic reasoning

Reasoning that moves from specific observations to a general conclusion.

Inductive reasoning

Reasoning that moves from a general premise to a specific conclusion.

Deductive reasoning

5.

MATCH QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Match the following statements with their corresponding premises in deductive reasoning.

These are the foundational beliefs that support the argument.

  • the sentences that make up the conclusion of an argument.

These are the detailed instances that back up the main point.

  • specific examples or details that support the claim.

These are the underlying assumptions that form the basis of the argument.

the assumptions or beliefs that underlie an argument.

These are opposing views presented to challenge the argument.

  • counterarguments to a claim.

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.SL.11-12.3

CCSS.W.11-12.1

6.

DROPDOWN QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

The conclusion of an argument should (a)  

Introduce new information not menti
Restate the thesis in exactly the s
Summarize the main points and reinf
Present a completely new claim.

Tags

CCSS.W.11-12.1E

CCSS.W.11-12.2F

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

A closed thesis statement:

States the main argument but leaves room for additional points.

Is a single sentence that summarizes the essay's main idea.

Is a question that the essay will answer.

Presents the main argument and supporting points.

Tags

CCSS.W.11-12.1A

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?