Reading Passage (2) Most of what is unusual about man can be summed up in one word: "culture." I use the word not in its snobbish sense, but as a scientist uses it. Cultural transmission is analogous to genetic transmission in that, 05 although basically conservative, it can give rise to a form of evolution. Geoffrey Chaucer could not hold a conversation with a modern Englishman, even though they are linked to each other by an unbroken chain of some twenty generations of Englishmen, each of whom 10 could speak to his immediate neighbors in the chain as a son speaks to his father. Language seems to "evolve" by non-genetic means, and at a rate which is orders of magnitude faster than genetic evolution. As an enthusiastic Darwinian, I have been dissatisfied 15 with explanations that my fellow-enthusiasts have offered for human behavior. They have tried to look for "biological advantages" in various attributes of human civilization. These ideas are plausible as far as they go, but I find that they do not begin to square 20 up to the formidable challenge of explaining culture, cultural evolution, and the immense differences between human cultures around the world. I think we have got to start again and go right back to first principles. The argument I shall advance is that, for 25 an understanding of the evolution of modern man, we must begin by throwing out the gene as the sole basis of our ideas on evolution. What, after all, is so special about genes The answer is that they are replicators. But do we have to go 30 to distant worlds to find other kinds of replicators and other kinds of evolution I think that a new kind of replicator has recently emerged on this very planet. It is staring us in the face. It is still in its infancy, still drifting clumsily about in its primeval soup, but already it is 35 achieving evolutionary change at a rate that leaves the old gene panting far behind. The new soup is the soup of human culture. We need a name for the new replicator, a noun that conveys the idea of a unit of cultural transmission, or a unit of 40 imitation. "Mimeme" comes from a suitable Greek root, but I want a monosyllable that sounds a bit like "gene." I hope my classicist friends will forgive me if I abbreviate "mimeme" to meme. Examples of memes are tunes, ideas, catch-phrases, clothes fashions, ways of making 45 pots or of building arches. Just as genes propagate themselves in the gene pool by leaping from body to body, so memes propagate themselves in the meme pool by leaping from brain to brain. If a scientist hears, or reads about, a good idea, he passes it on to his colleagues and 50 students. He mentions it in his articles and his lectures. If the idea catches on, it can be said to propagate itself, spreading from brain to brain. Imitation, in the broad sense, is how memes can replicate. But just as not all genes that can replicate do 55 so successfully, so some memes are more successful in the meme-pool than others. The longevity of any one copy of a meme is probably relatively unimportant, as it is for any one copy of a gene. The copy of the tune "Auld Lang Syne" that exists in my brain will last only 60 for the rest of my life. But I expect there will be copies of the same tune on paper and in people's brains for centuries to come. If the meme is a scientific idea, its spread will depend on how acceptable it is to the population of individual scientists; a rough measure of 65 its survival value could be obtained by counting the number of times it is referred to in successive years in scientific journals. If it is a popular tune, its spread through the meme pool may be gauged by the number of people heard whistling it in the streets. If it is a style 70 of women's shoe, the population memeticist may use sales statistics from shoe shops. Some memes, like some genes, achieve brilliant short- term success in spreading rapidly, but do not last long in the meme pool. Popular songs and stiletto heels 75 are examples. Others may continue to propagate themselves for thousands of years, usually because of the great potential permanence of written records. When we die there are two things we can leave behind us: genes and memes. We were built as gene 80 machines, created to pass on our genes. But that aspect of us will be forgotten in three generations. Your child, even your grandchild, may bear a resemblance to you, perhaps in facial features, in a talent for music, in the color of her hair. But as each generation passes, the contribution 85 of your genes is halved. It does not take long to reach negligible proportions. We should not seek immortality in reproduction. But if you contribute to the world's culture, if you have a good idea, compose a tune, invent a sparking plug, 90 write a poem, it may live on, intact, long after your genes have dissolved in the common pool. Socrates may or may not have a gene or two alive in the world today, but who cares The meme-complexes of Socrates, Leonardo, Copernicus and Marconi are still going strong. The author's motivation in writing the passage is his belief that:

B. genetics does not sufficiently explain human culture.

A. genes actually have nothing to do with human evolution.

C. culture is too obsessed with trivial things like fashion and pop songs.

D. humans are too concerned with seeking immortality.

Reading Passage (2) Most of what is unusual about man can be summed up in one word: "culture." I use the word not in its snobbish sense, but as a scientist uses it. Cultural transmission is analogous to genetic transmission in that, 05 although basically conservative, it can give rise to a form of evolution. Geoffrey Chaucer could not hold a conversation with a modern Englishman, even though they are linked to each other by an unbroken chain of some twenty generations of Englishmen, each of whom 10 could speak to his immediate neighbors in the chain as a son speaks to his father. Language seems to "evolve" by non-genetic means, and at a rate which is orders of magnitude faster than genetic evolution. As an enthusiastic Darwinian, I have been dissatisfied 15 with explanations that my fellow-enthusiasts have offered for human behavior. They have tried to look for "biological advantages" in various attributes of human civilization. These ideas are plausible as far as they go, but I find that they do not begin to square 20 up to the formidable challenge of explaining culture, cultural evolution, and the immense differences between human cultures around the world. I think we have got to start again and go right back to first principles. The argument I shall advance is that, for 25 an understanding of the evolution of modern man, we must begin by throwing out the gene as the sole basis of our ideas on evolution. What, after all, is so special about genes The answer is that they are replicators. But do we have to go 30 to distant worlds to find other kinds of replicators and other kinds of evolution I think that a new kind of replicator has recently emerged on this very planet. It is staring us in the face. It is still in its infancy, still drifting clumsily about in its primeval soup, but already it is 35 achieving evolutionary change at a rate that leaves the old gene panting far behind. The new soup is the soup of human culture. We need a name for the new replicator, a noun that conveys the idea of a unit of cultural transmission, or a unit of 40 imitation. "Mimeme" comes from a suitable Greek root, but I want a monosyllable that sounds a bit like "gene." I hope my classicist friends will forgive me if I abbreviate "mimeme" to meme. Examples of memes are tunes, ideas, catch-phrases, clothes fashions, ways of making 45 pots or of building arches. Just as genes propagate themselves in the gene pool by leaping from body to body, so memes propagate themselves in the meme pool by leaping from brain to brain. If a scientist hears, or reads about, a good idea, he passes it on to his colleagues and 50 students. He mentions it in his articles and his lectures. If the idea catches on, it can be said to propagate itself, spreading from brain to brain. Imitation, in the broad sense, is how memes can replicate. But just as not all genes that can replicate do 55 so successfully, so some memes are more successful in the meme-pool than others. The longevity of any one copy of a meme is probably relatively unimportant, as it is for any one copy of a gene. The copy of the tune "Auld Lang Syne" that exists in my brain will last only 60 for the rest of my life. But I expect there will be copies of the same tune on paper and in people's brains for centuries to come. If the meme is a scientific idea, its spread will depend on how acceptable it is to the population of individual scientists; a rough measure of 65 its survival value could be obtained by counting the number of times it is referred to in successive years in scientific journals. If it is a popular tune, its spread through the meme pool may be gauged by the number of people heard whistling it in the streets. If it is a style 70 of women's shoe, the population memeticist may use sales statistics from shoe shops. Some memes, like some genes, achieve brilliant short- term success in spreading rapidly, but do not last long in the meme pool. Popular songs and stiletto heels 75 are examples. Others may continue to propagate themselves for thousands of years, usually because of the great potential permanence of written records. When we die there are two things we can leave behind us: genes and memes. We were built as gene 80 machines, created to pass on our genes. But that aspect of us will be forgotten in three generations. Your child, even your grandchild, may bear a resemblance to you, perhaps in facial features, in a talent for music, in the color of her hair. But as each generation passes, the contribution 85 of your genes is halved. It does not take long to reach negligible proportions. We should not seek immortality in reproduction. But if you contribute to the world's culture, if you have a good idea, compose a tune, invent a sparking plug, 90 write a poem, it may live on, intact, long after your genes have dissolved in the common pool. Socrates may or may not have a gene or two alive in the world today, but who cares The meme-complexes of Socrates, Leonardo, Copernicus and Marconi are still going strong. When the author says that he uses the word culture "not in its snobbish sense, but as a scientist uses it" (lines 2-3), he means that he

J. does not distinguish between "good" and "bad" culture, but refers merely to the facts of human civilization.

F. plans to honestly admit what aspects of culture he really likes, rather than pretending he only likes the critically respected things.

G. does not believe that there is really such a thing as culture at all.

H. thinks that culture can be completely explained by Darwinian evolution.

Reading Passage (2) Most of what is unusual about man can be summed up in one word: "culture." I use the word not in its snobbish sense, but as a scientist uses it. Cultural transmission is analogous to genetic transmission in that, 05 although basically conservative, it can give rise to a form of evolution. Geoffrey Chaucer could not hold a conversation with a modern Englishman, even though they are linked to each other by an unbroken chain of some twenty generations of Englishmen, each of whom 10 could speak to his immediate neighbors in the chain as a son speaks to his father. Language seems to "evolve" by non-genetic means, and at a rate which is orders of magnitude faster than genetic evolution. As an enthusiastic Darwinian, I have been dissatisfied 15 with explanations that my fellow-enthusiasts have offered for human behavior. They have tried to look for "biological advantages" in various attributes of human civilization. These ideas are plausible as far as they go, but I find that they do not begin to square 20 up to the formidable challenge of explaining culture, cultural evolution, and the immense differences between human cultures around the world. I think we have got to start again and go right back to first principles. The argument I shall advance is that, for 25 an understanding of the evolution of modern man, we must begin by throwing out the gene as the sole basis of our ideas on evolution. What, after all, is so special about genes The answer is that they are replicators. But do we have to go 30 to distant worlds to find other kinds of replicators and other kinds of evolution I think that a new kind of replicator has recently emerged on this very planet. It is staring us in the face. It is still in its infancy, still drifting clumsily about in its primeval soup, but already it is 35 achieving evolutionary change at a rate that leaves the old gene panting far behind. The new soup is the soup of human culture. We need a name for the new replicator, a noun that conveys the idea of a unit of cultural transmission, or a unit of 40 imitation. "Mimeme" comes from a suitable Greek root, but I want a monosyllable that sounds a bit like "gene." I hope my classicist friends will forgive me if I abbreviate "mimeme" to meme. Examples of memes are tunes, ideas, catch-phrases, clothes fashions, ways of making 45 pots or of building arches. Just as genes propagate themselves in the gene pool by leaping from body to body, so memes propagate themselves in the meme pool by leaping from brain to brain. If a scientist hears, or reads about, a good idea, he passes it on to his colleagues and 50 students. He mentions it in his articles and his lectures. If the idea catches on, it can be said to propagate itself, spreading from brain to brain. Imitation, in the broad sense, is how memes can replicate. But just as not all genes that can replicate do 55 so successfully, so some memes are more successful in the meme-pool than others. The longevity of any one copy of a meme is probably relatively unimportant, as it is for any one copy of a gene. The copy of the tune "Auld Lang Syne" that exists in my brain will last only 60 for the rest of my life. But I expect there will be copies of the same tune on paper and in people's brains for centuries to come. If the meme is a scientific idea, its spread will depend on how acceptable it is to the population of individual scientists; a rough measure of 65 its survival value could be obtained by counting the number of times it is referred to in successive years in scientific journals. If it is a popular tune, its spread through the meme pool may be gauged by the number of people heard whistling it in the streets. If it is a style 70 of women's shoe, the population memeticist may use sales statistics from shoe shops. Some memes, like some genes, achieve brilliant short- term success in spreading rapidly, but do not last long in the meme pool. Popular songs and stiletto heels 75 are examples. Others may continue to propagate themselves for thousands of years, usually because of the great potential permanence of written records. When we die there are two things we can leave behind us: genes and memes. We were built as gene 80 machines, created to pass on our genes. But that aspect of us will be forgotten in three generations. Your child, even your grandchild, may bear a resemblance to you, perhaps in facial features, in a talent for music, in the color of her hair. But as each generation passes, the contribution 85 of your genes is halved. It does not take long to reach negligible proportions. We should not seek immortality in reproduction. But if you contribute to the world's culture, if you have a good idea, compose a tune, invent a sparking plug, 90 write a poem, it may live on, intact, long after your genes have dissolved in the common pool. Socrates may or may not have a gene or two alive in the world today, but who cares The meme-complexes of Socrates, Leonardo, Copernicus and Marconi are still going strong. According to the author, one thing that genes and memes have in common is that they are both:

G. still only unproven theories rather than facts.

H. ideas that people in the future will only know about because of written records.

J. capable of inspiring great art.

Reading Passage (2) Most of what is unusual about man can be summed up in one word: "culture." I use the word not in its snobbish sense, but as a scientist uses it. Cultural transmission is analogous to genetic transmission in that, 05 although basically conservative, it can give rise to a form of evolution. Geoffrey Chaucer could not hold a conversation with a modern Englishman, even though they are linked to each other by an unbroken chain of some twenty generations of Englishmen, each of whom 10 could speak to his immediate neighbors in the chain as a son speaks to his father. Language seems to "evolve" by non-genetic means, and at a rate which is orders of magnitude faster than genetic evolution. As an enthusiastic Darwinian, I have been dissatisfied 15 with explanations that my fellow-enthusiasts have offered for human behavior. They have tried to look for "biological advantages" in various attributes of human civilization. These ideas are plausible as far as they go, but I find that they do not begin to square 20 up to the formidable challenge of explaining culture, cultural evolution, and the immense differences between human cultures around the world. I think we have got to start again and go right back to first principles. The argument I shall advance is that, for 25 an understanding of the evolution of modern man, we must begin by throwing out the gene as the sole basis of our ideas on evolution. What, after all, is so special about genes The answer is that they are replicators. But do we have to go 30 to distant worlds to find other kinds of replicators and other kinds of evolution I think that a new kind of replicator has recently emerged on this very planet. It is staring us in the face. It is still in its infancy, still drifting clumsily about in its primeval soup, but already it is 35 achieving evolutionary change at a rate that leaves the old gene panting far behind. The new soup is the soup of human culture. We need a name for the new replicator, a noun that conveys the idea of a unit of cultural transmission, or a unit of 40 imitation. "Mimeme" comes from a suitable Greek root, but I want a monosyllable that sounds a bit like "gene." I hope my classicist friends will forgive me if I abbreviate "mimeme" to meme. Examples of memes are tunes, ideas, catch-phrases, clothes fashions, ways of making 45 pots or of building arches. Just as genes propagate themselves in the gene pool by leaping from body to body, so memes propagate themselves in the meme pool by leaping from brain to brain. If a scientist hears, or reads about, a good idea, he passes it on to his colleagues and 50 students. He mentions it in his articles and his lectures. If the idea catches on, it can be said to propagate itself, spreading from brain to brain. Imitation, in the broad sense, is how memes can replicate. But just as not all genes that can replicate do 55 so successfully, so some memes are more successful in the meme-pool than others. The longevity of any one copy of a meme is probably relatively unimportant, as it is for any one copy of a gene. The copy of the tune "Auld Lang Syne" that exists in my brain will last only 60 for the rest of my life. But I expect there will be copies of the same tune on paper and in people's brains for centuries to come. If the meme is a scientific idea, its spread will depend on how acceptable it is to the population of individual scientists; a rough measure of 65 its survival value could be obtained by counting the number of times it is referred to in successive years in scientific journals. If it is a popular tune, its spread through the meme pool may be gauged by the number of people heard whistling it in the streets. If it is a style 70 of women's shoe, the population memeticist may use sales statistics from shoe shops. Some memes, like some genes, achieve brilliant short- term success in spreading rapidly, but do not last long in the meme pool. Popular songs and stiletto heels 75 are examples. Others may continue to propagate themselves for thousands of years, usually because of the great potential permanence of written records. When we die there are two things we can leave behind us: genes and memes. We were built as gene 80 machines, created to pass on our genes. But that aspect of us will be forgotten in three generations. Your child, even your grandchild, may bear a resemblance to you, perhaps in facial features, in a talent for music, in the color of her hair. But as each generation passes, the contribution 85 of your genes is halved. It does not take long to reach negligible proportions. We should not seek immortality in reproduction. But if you contribute to the world's culture, if you have a good idea, compose a tune, invent a sparking plug, 90 write a poem, it may live on, intact, long after your genes have dissolved in the common pool. Socrates may or may not have a gene or two alive in the world today, but who cares The meme-complexes of Socrates, Leonardo, Copernicus and Marconi are still going strong. The author mentions Geoffrey Chaucer in the first paragraph as an example of:

D. a speaker of English as it existed twenty generations ago.

A. a pioneer in the field of mimetics.

B. one of the first major poets to write in English.

C. someone who would not have understood modern science, even though he was a genius for his time.

Reading Passage (2) Most of what is unusual about man can be summed up in one word: "culture." I use the word not in its snobbish sense, but as a scientist uses it. Cultural transmission is analogous to genetic transmission in that, 05 although basically conservative, it can give rise to a form of evolution. Geoffrey Chaucer could not hold a conversation with a modern Englishman, even though they are linked to each other by an unbroken chain of some twenty generations of Englishmen, each of whom 10 could speak to his immediate neighbors in the chain as a son speaks to his father. Language seems to "evolve" by non-genetic means, and at a rate which is orders of magnitude faster than genetic evolution. As an enthusiastic Darwinian, I have been dissatisfied 15 with explanations that my fellow-enthusiasts have offered for human behavior. They have tried to look for "biological advantages" in various attributes of human civilization. These ideas are plausible as far as they go, but I find that they do not begin to square 20 up to the formidable challenge of explaining culture, cultural evolution, and the immense differences between human cultures around the world. I think we have got to start again and go right back to first principles. The argument I shall advance is that, for 25 an understanding of the evolution of modern man, we must begin by throwing out the gene as the sole basis of our ideas on evolution. What, after all, is so special about genes The answer is that they are replicators. But do we have to go 30 to distant worlds to find other kinds of replicators and other kinds of evolution I think that a new kind of replicator has recently emerged on this very planet. It is staring us in the face. It is still in its infancy, still drifting clumsily about in its primeval soup, but already it is 35 achieving evolutionary change at a rate that leaves the old gene panting far behind. The new soup is the soup of human culture. We need a name for the new replicator, a noun that conveys the idea of a unit of cultural transmission, or a unit of 40 imitation. "Mimeme" comes from a suitable Greek root, but I want a monosyllable that sounds a bit like "gene." I hope my classicist friends will forgive me if I abbreviate "mimeme" to meme. Examples of memes are tunes, ideas, catch-phrases, clothes fashions, ways of making 45 pots or of building arches. Just as genes propagate themselves in the gene pool by leaping from body to body, so memes propagate themselves in the meme pool by leaping from brain to brain. If a scientist hears, or reads about, a good idea, he passes it on to his colleagues and 50 students. He mentions it in his articles and his lectures. If the idea catches on, it can be said to propagate itself, spreading from brain to brain. Imitation, in the broad sense, is how memes can replicate. But just as not all genes that can replicate do 55 so successfully, so some memes are more successful in the meme-pool than others. The longevity of any one copy of a meme is probably relatively unimportant, as it is for any one copy of a gene. The copy of the tune "Auld Lang Syne" that exists in my brain will last only 60 for the rest of my life. But I expect there will be copies of the same tune on paper and in people's brains for centuries to come. If the meme is a scientific idea, its spread will depend on how acceptable it is to the population of individual scientists; a rough measure of 65 its survival value could be obtained by counting the number of times it is referred to in successive years in scientific journals. If it is a popular tune, its spread through the meme pool may be gauged by the number of people heard whistling it in the streets. If it is a style 70 of women's shoe, the population memeticist may use sales statistics from shoe shops. Some memes, like some genes, achieve brilliant short- term success in spreading rapidly, but do not last long in the meme pool. Popular songs and stiletto heels 75 are examples. Others may continue to propagate themselves for thousands of years, usually because of the great potential permanence of written records. When we die there are two things we can leave behind us: genes and memes. We were built as gene 80 machines, created to pass on our genes. But that aspect of us will be forgotten in three generations. Your child, even your grandchild, may bear a resemblance to you, perhaps in facial features, in a talent for music, in the color of her hair. But as each generation passes, the contribution 85 of your genes is halved. It does not take long to reach negligible proportions. We should not seek immortality in reproduction. But if you contribute to the world's culture, if you have a good idea, compose a tune, invent a sparking plug, 90 write a poem, it may live on, intact, long after your genes have dissolved in the common pool. Socrates may or may not have a gene or two alive in the world today, but who cares The meme-complexes of Socrates, Leonardo, Copernicus and Marconi are still going strong. According to the passage, the word meme was invented by:

C. the author's former teacher.

Reading Passage (2) Most of what is unusual about man can be summed up in one word: "culture." I use the word not in its snobbish sense, but as a scientist uses it. Cultural transmission is analogous to genetic transmission in that, 05 although basically conservative, it can give rise to a form of evolution. Geoffrey Chaucer could not hold a conversation with a modern Englishman, even though they are linked to each other by an unbroken chain of some twenty generations of Englishmen, each of whom 10 could speak to his immediate neighbors in the chain as a son speaks to his father. Language seems to "evolve" by non-genetic means, and at a rate which is orders of magnitude faster than genetic evolution. As an enthusiastic Darwinian, I have been dissatisfied 15 with explanations that my fellow-enthusiasts have offered for human behavior. They have tried to look for "biological advantages" in various attributes of human civilization. These ideas are plausible as far as they go, but I find that they do not begin to square 20 up to the formidable challenge of explaining culture, cultural evolution, and the immense differences between human cultures around the world. I think we have got to start again and go right back to first principles. The argument I shall advance is that, for 25 an understanding of the evolution of modern man, we must begin by throwing out the gene as the sole basis of our ideas on evolution. What, after all, is so special about genes The answer is that they are replicators. But do we have to go 30 to distant worlds to find other kinds of replicators and other kinds of evolution I think that a new kind of replicator has recently emerged on this very planet. It is staring us in the face. It is still in its infancy, still drifting clumsily about in its primeval soup, but already it is 35 achieving evolutionary change at a rate that leaves the old gene panting far behind. The new soup is the soup of human culture. We need a name for the new replicator, a noun that conveys the idea of a unit of cultural transmission, or a unit of 40 imitation. "Mimeme" comes from a suitable Greek root, but I want a monosyllable that sounds a bit like "gene." I hope my classicist friends will forgive me if I abbreviate "mimeme" to meme. Examples of memes are tunes, ideas, catch-phrases, clothes fashions, ways of making 45 pots or of building arches. Just as genes propagate themselves in the gene pool by leaping from body to body, so memes propagate themselves in the meme pool by leaping from brain to brain. If a scientist hears, or reads about, a good idea, he passes it on to his colleagues and 50 students. He mentions it in his articles and his lectures. If the idea catches on, it can be said to propagate itself, spreading from brain to brain. Imitation, in the broad sense, is how memes can replicate. But just as not all genes that can replicate do 55 so successfully, so some memes are more successful in the meme-pool than others. The longevity of any one copy of a meme is probably relatively unimportant, as it is for any one copy of a gene. The copy of the tune "Auld Lang Syne" that exists in my brain will last only 60 for the rest of my life. But I expect there will be copies of the same tune on paper and in people's brains for centuries to come. If the meme is a scientific idea, its spread will depend on how acceptable it is to the population of individual scientists; a rough measure of 65 its survival value could be obtained by counting the number of times it is referred to in successive years in scientific journals. If it is a popular tune, its spread through the meme pool may be gauged by the number of people heard whistling it in the streets. If it is a style 70 of women's shoe, the population memeticist may use sales statistics from shoe shops. Some memes, like some genes, achieve brilliant short- term success in spreading rapidly, but do not last long in the meme pool. Popular songs and stiletto heels 75 are examples. Others may continue to propagate themselves for thousands of years, usually because of the great potential permanence of written records. When we die there are two things we can leave behind us: genes and memes. We were built as gene 80 machines, created to pass on our genes. But that aspect of us will be forgotten in three generations. Your child, even your grandchild, may bear a resemblance to you, perhaps in facial features, in a talent for music, in the color of her hair. But as each generation passes, the contribution 85 of your genes is halved. It does not take long to reach negligible proportions. We should not seek immortality in reproduction. But if you contribute to the world's culture, if you have a good idea, compose a tune, invent a sparking plug, 90 write a poem, it may live on, intact, long after your genes have dissolved in the common pool. Socrates may or may not have a gene or two alive in the world today, but who cares The meme-complexes of Socrates, Leonardo, Copernicus and Marconi are still going strong. The author states that [t]he copy of the tune 'Auld Lang Syne' that exists in my brain will last only for the rest of my life (lines 58-60) in order to demonstrate that:

H. no one copy of an idea is vital, as long as the idea survives.

F. no two people's brains are alike.

G. memories do not survive death.

J. he is older than he imagines most of his readers will be, and accordingly has memories of older songs.

Reading Passage (2) Most of what is unusual about man can be summed up in one word: "culture." I use the word not in its snobbish sense, but as a scientist uses it. Cultural transmission is analogous to genetic transmission in that, 05 although basically conservative, it can give rise to a form of evolution. Geoffrey Chaucer could not hold a conversation with a modern Englishman, even though they are linked to each other by an unbroken chain of some twenty generations of Englishmen, each of whom 10 could speak to his immediate neighbors in the chain as a son speaks to his father. Language seems to "evolve" by non-genetic means, and at a rate which is orders of magnitude faster than genetic evolution. As an enthusiastic Darwinian, I have been dissatisfied 15 with explanations that my fellow-enthusiasts have offered for human behavior. They have tried to look for "biological advantages" in various attributes of human civilization. These ideas are plausible as far as they go, but I find that they do not begin to square 20 up to the formidable challenge of explaining culture, cultural evolution, and the immense differences between human cultures around the world. I think we have got to start again and go right back to first principles. The argument I shall advance is that, for 25 an understanding of the evolution of modern man, we must begin by throwing out the gene as the sole basis of our ideas on evolution. What, after all, is so special about genes The answer is that they are replicators. But do we have to go 30 to distant worlds to find other kinds of replicators and other kinds of evolution I think that a new kind of replicator has recently emerged on this very planet. It is staring us in the face. It is still in its infancy, still drifting clumsily about in its primeval soup, but already it is 35 achieving evolutionary change at a rate that leaves the old gene panting far behind. The new soup is the soup of human culture. We need a name for the new replicator, a noun that conveys the idea of a unit of cultural transmission, or a unit of 40 imitation. "Mimeme" comes from a suitable Greek root, but I want a monosyllable that sounds a bit like "gene." I hope my classicist friends will forgive me if I abbreviate "mimeme" to meme. Examples of memes are tunes, ideas, catch-phrases, clothes fashions, ways of making 45 pots or of building arches. Just as genes propagate themselves in the gene pool by leaping from body to body, so memes propagate themselves in the meme pool by leaping from brain to brain. If a scientist hears, or reads about, a good idea, he passes it on to his colleagues and 50 students. He mentions it in his articles and his lectures. If the idea catches on, it can be said to propagate itself, spreading from brain to brain. Imitation, in the broad sense, is how memes can replicate. But just as not all genes that can replicate do 55 so successfully, so some memes are more successful in the meme-pool than others. The longevity of any one copy of a meme is probably relatively unimportant, as it is for any one copy of a gene. The copy of the tune "Auld Lang Syne" that exists in my brain will last only 60 for the rest of my life. But I expect there will be copies of the same tune on paper and in people's brains for centuries to come. If the meme is a scientific idea, its spread will depend on how acceptable it is to the population of individual scientists; a rough measure of 65 its survival value could be obtained by counting the number of times it is referred to in successive years in scientific journals. If it is a popular tune, its spread through the meme pool may be gauged by the number of people heard whistling it in the streets. If it is a style 70 of women's shoe, the population memeticist may use sales statistics from shoe shops. Some memes, like some genes, achieve brilliant short- term success in spreading rapidly, but do not last long in the meme pool. Popular songs and stiletto heels 75 are examples. Others may continue to propagate themselves for thousands of years, usually because of the great potential permanence of written records. When we die there are two things we can leave behind us: genes and memes. We were built as gene 80 machines, created to pass on our genes. But that aspect of us will be forgotten in three generations. Your child, even your grandchild, may bear a resemblance to you, perhaps in facial features, in a talent for music, in the color of her hair. But as each generation passes, the contribution 85 of your genes is halved. It does not take long to reach negligible proportions. We should not seek immortality in reproduction. But if you contribute to the world's culture, if you have a good idea, compose a tune, invent a sparking plug, 90 write a poem, it may live on, intact, long after your genes have dissolved in the common pool. Socrates may or may not have a gene or two alive in the world today, but who cares The meme-complexes of Socrates, Leonardo, Copernicus and Marconi are still going strong. According to the author, the "survival value" of a meme is expressed by:

A. how widespread the meme itself becomes.

B. how it contributes to the survival of the people who have memories of it.

C. whether it makes the people who have memories of it into better people or worse people.

D. whether scientists believe that it is true or false.

Reading Passage (2) Most of what is unusual about man can be summed up in one word: "culture." I use the word not in its snobbish sense, but as a scientist uses it. Cultural transmission is analogous to genetic transmission in that, 05 although basically conservative, it can give rise to a form of evolution. Geoffrey Chaucer could not hold a conversation with a modern Englishman, even though they are linked to each other by an unbroken chain of some twenty generations of Englishmen, each of whom 10 could speak to his immediate neighbors in the chain as a son speaks to his father. Language seems to "evolve" by non-genetic means, and at a rate which is orders of magnitude faster than genetic evolution. As an enthusiastic Darwinian, I have been dissatisfied 15 with explanations that my fellow-enthusiasts have offered for human behavior. They have tried to look for "biological advantages" in various attributes of human civilization. These ideas are plausible as far as they go, but I find that they do not begin to square 20 up to the formidable challenge of explaining culture, cultural evolution, and the immense differences between human cultures around the world. I think we have got to start again and go right back to first principles. The argument I shall advance is that, for 25 an understanding of the evolution of modern man, we must begin by throwing out the gene as the sole basis of our ideas on evolution. What, after all, is so special about genes The answer is that they are replicators. But do we have to go 30 to distant worlds to find other kinds of replicators and other kinds of evolution I think that a new kind of replicator has recently emerged on this very planet. It is staring us in the face. It is still in its infancy, still drifting clumsily about in its primeval soup, but already it is 35 achieving evolutionary change at a rate that leaves the old gene panting far behind. The new soup is the soup of human culture. We need a name for the new replicator, a noun that conveys the idea of a unit of cultural transmission, or a unit of 40 imitation. "Mimeme" comes from a suitable Greek root, but I want a monosyllable that sounds a bit like "gene." I hope my classicist friends will forgive me if I abbreviate "mimeme" to meme. Examples of memes are tunes, ideas, catch-phrases, clothes fashions, ways of making 45 pots or of building arches. Just as genes propagate themselves in the gene pool by leaping from body to body, so memes propagate themselves in the meme pool by leaping from brain to brain. If a scientist hears, or reads about, a good idea, he passes it on to his colleagues and 50 students. He mentions it in his articles and his lectures. If the idea catches on, it can be said to propagate itself, spreading from brain to brain. Imitation, in the broad sense, is how memes can replicate. But just as not all genes that can replicate do 55 so successfully, so some memes are more successful in the meme-pool than others. The longevity of any one copy of a meme is probably relatively unimportant, as it is for any one copy of a gene. The copy of the tune "Auld Lang Syne" that exists in my brain will last only 60 for the rest of my life. But I expect there will be copies of the same tune on paper and in people's brains for centuries to come. If the meme is a scientific idea, its spread will depend on how acceptable it is to the population of individual scientists; a rough measure of 65 its survival value could be obtained by counting the number of times it is referred to in successive years in scientific journals. If it is a popular tune, its spread through the meme pool may be gauged by the number of people heard whistling it in the streets. If it is a style 70 of women's shoe, the population memeticist may use sales statistics from shoe shops. Some memes, like some genes, achieve brilliant short- term success in spreading rapidly, but do not last long in the meme pool. Popular songs and stiletto heels 75 are examples. Others may continue to propagate themselves for thousands of years, usually because of the great potential permanence of written records. When we die there are two things we can leave behind us: genes and memes. We were built as gene 80 machines, created to pass on our genes. But that aspect of us will be forgotten in three generations. Your child, even your grandchild, may bear a resemblance to you, perhaps in facial features, in a talent for music, in the color of her hair. But as each generation passes, the contribution 85 of your genes is halved. It does not take long to reach negligible proportions. We should not seek immortality in reproduction. But if you contribute to the world's culture, if you have a good idea, compose a tune, invent a sparking plug, 90 write a poem, it may live on, intact, long after your genes have dissolved in the common pool. Socrates may or may not have a gene or two alive in the world today, but who cares The meme-complexes of Socrates, Leonardo, Copernicus and Marconi are still going strong. The author mentions "Socrates, Leonardo, Copernicus and Marconi" in the closing paragraph because they are:

G. people whose ideas have become extremely influential.

F. people whose genes have become extremely widespread.

H. the four most complex thinkers in the history of science.

J. the people who made the biggest contributions to the field of memetics.

Reading Passage (3) Successful women know only too well that in any male-dominated profession, we often find ourselves at a disadvantage. We are routinely underestimated, underutilized and even underpaid. Studies show that women need 5 to perform at extraordinarily high levels just to appear moderately competent compared to our male coworkers. But in my experience, smart and talented women rarely realize that one of the toughest hurdles they'll have to overcome lies within. Compared with our male 10 colleagues, we judge our own abilities not only more harshly but fundamentally differently. Understanding why we do it is the first step to righting a terrible wrong. And to do that, we need to take a step back in time. Chances are good that if you are a successful professional 15 today, you were a pretty bright fifth grade girl. Psychologist Carol Dweck conducted a series of studies in the 1980s looking at how bright girls and boys in the fifth grade handled new, difficult and confusing material. She found that bright girls, when given something to 20 learn that was particularly foreign or complex, were quick to give up; the higher the girls' IQ, the more likely they were to throw in the towel. In fact, the straight-A girls showed the most helpless responses. Bright boys, on the other hand, saw the difficult material as a challenge, 25 and found it energizing. They were more likely to redouble their efforts than give up. Why does this happen What makes smart girls less confident when they should be the most confident kids in the room At the 5th-grade level, girls routinely 30 outperform boys in every subject, including math and science. So there were no differences between these boys and girls in ability, nor in past history of success. The only difference was how bright boys and girls interpreted difficulty-what it meant to them when material seemed 35 hard to learn. Bright girls were much quicker to doubt their ability, to lose confidence and to become less effective learners as a result. Researchers have uncovered the reason for this difference in how difficulty is interpreted: more often than 40 not, bright girls believe that their abilities are innate and unchangeable, while bright boys believe that they can develop ability through effort and practice. How do girls and boys develop these different views Most likely, it has to do with the kinds of feedback 45 we get from parents and teachers as children. Girls, who develop self-control earlier and are better able to follow instructions, are often praised for their "goodness." When we do well in school, we are told that we are "so smart," "so clever," or "such a good student." This kind 50 of praise implies that traits like smartness, cleverness and goodness are qualities you either have or you don't. Boys, on the other hand, are a handful. Just trying to get boys to sit still and pay attention is a real challenge for any parent or teacher. As a result, boys are given feedback 55 that emphasizes effort (e.g., "If you would just pay attention you could learn this," "If you would just try a little harder you could get it right"). The result: when learning something new is difficult, girls take it as a sign that they aren't "good" and "smart," and boys take it as a 60 sign to try harder. We continue to carry these beliefs, often unconsciously, around with us throughout our lives. And because bright girls are particularly likely to see their abilities as innate and unchangeable, they grow up to be 65 women who are far too hard on themselves-women who will prematurely conclude that they don't have what it takes to succeed in a particular arena, and give up way too soon. Even if every external disadvantage is 70 removed-every inequality of opportunity, every chauvinistic stereotype, all the challenges we face balancing work and family-we would still have to deal with the fact that through our mistaken beliefs about our abilities, we may be our own worst enemy. 75 How often have you found yourself avoiding challenges and playing it safe, sticking to goals you knew would be easy for you to reach Are there things you decided long ago that you could never be good at Skills you believed you would never possess If the list is a 80 long one, you were probably one of the bright girls-and your belief that you are stuck being exactly as you are has done more to determine the course of your life than you probably ever imagined. No matter the ability-whether it's intelligence, 85 creativity, self-control, charm or athleticism-studies show them to be profoundly malleable. When it comes to mastering any skill, your experience, effort and persistence matter a lot. So if you were a bright girl, it's time to toss out your mistaken belief about how ability works, 90 embrace the fact that you can always improve and reclaim the confidence that you lost so long ago. The main idea of the passage is that:

B. paradoxically, bright girls grow up to be far less confident in themselves than they should be.

A. educational methodology in our society is biased against girls, especially bright ones.

C. because they mature faster, girls are better at following directions than boys are.

D. contrary to popular belief, there are actually no differences in how girls and boys learn.

Reading Passage (3) Successful women know only too well that in any male-dominated profession, we often find ourselves at a disadvantage. We are routinely underestimated, underutilized and even underpaid. Studies show that women need 5 to perform at extraordinarily high levels just to appear moderately competent compared to our male coworkers. But in my experience, smart and talented women rarely realize that one of the toughest hurdles they'll have to overcome lies within. Compared with our male 10 colleagues, we judge our own abilities not only more harshly but fundamentally differently. Understanding why we do it is the first step to righting a terrible wrong. And to do that, we need to take a step back in time. Chances are good that if you are a successful professional 15 today, you were a pretty bright fifth grade girl. Psychologist Carol Dweck conducted a series of studies in the 1980s looking at how bright girls and boys in the fifth grade handled new, difficult and confusing material. She found that bright girls, when given something to 20 learn that was particularly foreign or complex, were quick to give up; the higher the girls' IQ, the more likely they were to throw in the towel. In fact, the straight-A girls showed the most helpless responses. Bright boys, on the other hand, saw the difficult material as a challenge, 25 and found it energizing. They were more likely to redouble their efforts than give up. Why does this happen What makes smart girls less confident when they should be the most confident kids in the room At the 5th-grade level, girls routinely 30 outperform boys in every subject, including math and science. So there were no differences between these boys and girls in ability, nor in past history of success. The only difference was how bright boys and girls interpreted difficulty-what it meant to them when material seemed 35 hard to learn. Bright girls were much quicker to doubt their ability, to lose confidence and to become less effective learners as a result. Researchers have uncovered the reason for this difference in how difficulty is interpreted: more often than 40 not, bright girls believe that their abilities are innate and unchangeable, while bright boys believe that they can develop ability through effort and practice. How do girls and boys develop these different views Most likely, it has to do with the kinds of feedback 45 we get from parents and teachers as children. Girls, who develop self-control earlier and are better able to follow instructions, are often praised for their "goodness." When we do well in school, we are told that we are "so smart," "so clever," or "such a good student." This kind 50 of praise implies that traits like smartness, cleverness and goodness are qualities you either have or you don't. Boys, on the other hand, are a handful. Just trying to get boys to sit still and pay attention is a real challenge for any parent or teacher. As a result, boys are given feedback 55 that emphasizes effort (e.g., "If you would just pay attention you could learn this," "If you would just try a little harder you could get it right"). The result: when learning something new is difficult, girls take it as a sign that they aren't "good" and "smart," and boys take it as a 60 sign to try harder. We continue to carry these beliefs, often unconsciously, around with us throughout our lives. And because bright girls are particularly likely to see their abilities as innate and unchangeable, they grow up to be 65 women who are far too hard on themselves-women who will prematurely conclude that they don't have what it takes to succeed in a particular arena, and give up way too soon. Even if every external disadvantage is 70 removed-every inequality of opportunity, every chauvinistic stereotype, all the challenges we face balancing work and family-we would still have to deal with the fact that through our mistaken beliefs about our abilities, we may be our own worst enemy. 75 How often have you found yourself avoiding challenges and playing it safe, sticking to goals you knew would be easy for you to reach Are there things you decided long ago that you could never be good at Skills you believed you would never possess If the list is a 80 long one, you were probably one of the bright girls-and your belief that you are stuck being exactly as you are has done more to determine the course of your life than you probably ever imagined. No matter the ability-whether it's intelligence, 85 creativity, self-control, charm or athleticism-studies show them to be profoundly malleable. When it comes to mastering any skill, your experience, effort and persistence matter a lot. So if you were a bright girl, it's time to toss out your mistaken belief about how ability works, 90 embrace the fact that you can always improve and reclaim the confidence that you lost so long ago. One of the main ideas of the seventh paragraph (lines 43-51) is that:

A. adults unintentionally contribute to the low confidence of bright girls.

B. bright boys at the elementary school level do not receive sufficient praise from adults.

C. most adults mistakenly believe that girls develop self-control earlier than boys.

D. adults should make more of an effort to praise all students, rather than just the bright ones.

Reading Passage (3) Successful women know only too well that in any male-dominated profession, we often find ourselves at a disadvantage. We are routinely underestimated, underutilized and even underpaid. Studies show that women need 5 to perform at extraordinarily high levels just to appear moderately competent compared to our male coworkers. But in my experience, smart and talented women rarely realize that one of the toughest hurdles they'll have to overcome lies within. Compared with our male 10 colleagues, we judge our own abilities not only more harshly but fundamentally differently. Understanding why we do it is the first step to righting a terrible wrong. And to do that, we need to take a step back in time. Chances are good that if you are a successful professional 15 today, you were a pretty bright fifth grade girl. Psychologist Carol Dweck conducted a series of studies in the 1980s looking at how bright girls and boys in the fifth grade handled new, difficult and confusing material. She found that bright girls, when given something to 20 learn that was particularly foreign or complex, were quick to give up; the higher the girls' IQ, the more likely they were to throw in the towel. In fact, the straight-A girls showed the most helpless responses. Bright boys, on the other hand, saw the difficult material as a challenge, 25 and found it energizing. They were more likely to redouble their efforts than give up. Why does this happen What makes smart girls less confident when they should be the most confident kids in the room At the 5th-grade level, girls routinely 30 outperform boys in every subject, including math and science. So there were no differences between these boys and girls in ability, nor in past history of success. The only difference was how bright boys and girls interpreted difficulty-what it meant to them when material seemed 35 hard to learn. Bright girls were much quicker to doubt their ability, to lose confidence and to become less effective learners as a result. Researchers have uncovered the reason for this difference in how difficulty is interpreted: more often than 40 not, bright girls believe that their abilities are innate and unchangeable, while bright boys believe that they can develop ability through effort and practice. How do girls and boys develop these different views Most likely, it has to do with the kinds of feedback 45 we get from parents and teachers as children. Girls, who develop self-control earlier and are better able to follow instructions, are often praised for their "goodness." When we do well in school, we are told that we are "so smart," "so clever," or "such a good student." This kind 50 of praise implies that traits like smartness, cleverness and goodness are qualities you either have or you don't. Boys, on the other hand, are a handful. Just trying to get boys to sit still and pay attention is a real challenge for any parent or teacher. As a result, boys are given feedback 55 that emphasizes effort (e.g., "If you would just pay attention you could learn this," "If you would just try a little harder you could get it right"). The result: when learning something new is difficult, girls take it as a sign that they aren't "good" and "smart," and boys take it as a 60 sign to try harder. We continue to carry these beliefs, often unconsciously, around with us throughout our lives. And because bright girls are particularly likely to see their abilities as innate and unchangeable, they grow up to be 65 women who are far too hard on themselves-women who will prematurely conclude that they don't have what it takes to succeed in a particular arena, and give up way too soon. Even if every external disadvantage is 70 removed-every inequality of opportunity, every chauvinistic stereotype, all the challenges we face balancing work and family-we would still have to deal with the fact that through our mistaken beliefs about our abilities, we may be our own worst enemy. 75 How often have you found yourself avoiding challenges and playing it safe, sticking to goals you knew would be easy for you to reach Are there things you decided long ago that you could never be good at Skills you believed you would never possess If the list is a 80 long one, you were probably one of the bright girls-and your belief that you are stuck being exactly as you are has done more to determine the course of your life than you probably ever imagined. No matter the ability-whether it's intelligence, 85 creativity, self-control, charm or athleticism-studies show them to be profoundly malleable. When it comes to mastering any skill, your experience, effort and persistence matter a lot. So if you were a bright girl, it's time to toss out your mistaken belief about how ability works, 90 embrace the fact that you can always improve and reclaim the confidence that you lost so long ago. According to the passage, which of the following factors does NOT contribute to eventual confidence problems in bright girls?

F. Their knowledge of the fact that adult women, even bright ones, are often underpaid

G. The fact that young girls tend to be better behaved than young boys are

H. A valuable approach to challenges that adults unintentionally instill only in boys

J. Inferences about the nature of academic ability drawn from the language of teachers

Reading Passage (3) Successful women know only too well that in any male-dominated profession, we often find ourselves at a disadvantage. We are routinely underestimated, underutilized and even underpaid. Studies show that women need 5 to perform at extraordinarily high levels just to appear moderately competent compared to our male coworkers. But in my experience, smart and talented women rarely realize that one of the toughest hurdles they'll have to overcome lies within. Compared with our male 10 colleagues, we judge our own abilities not only more harshly but fundamentally differently. Understanding why we do it is the first step to righting a terrible wrong. And to do that, we need to take a step back in time. Chances are good that if you are a successful professional 15 today, you were a pretty bright fifth grade girl. Psychologist Carol Dweck conducted a series of studies in the 1980s looking at how bright girls and boys in the fifth grade handled new, difficult and confusing material. She found that bright girls, when given something to 20 learn that was particularly foreign or complex, were quick to give up; the higher the girls' IQ, the more likely they were to throw in the towel. In fact, the straight-A girls showed the most helpless responses. Bright boys, on the other hand, saw the difficult material as a challenge, 25 and found it energizing. They were more likely to redouble their efforts than give up. Why does this happen What makes smart girls less confident when they should be the most confident kids in the room At the 5th-grade level, girls routinely 30 outperform boys in every subject, including math and science. So there were no differences between these boys and girls in ability, nor in past history of success. The only difference was how bright boys and girls interpreted difficulty-what it meant to them when material seemed 35 hard to learn. Bright girls were much quicker to doubt their ability, to lose confidence and to become less effective learners as a result. Researchers have uncovered the reason for this difference in how difficulty is interpreted: more often than 40 not, bright girls believe that their abilities are innate and unchangeable, while bright boys believe that they can develop ability through effort and practice. How do girls and boys develop these different views Most likely, it has to do with the kinds of feedback 45 we get from parents and teachers as children. Girls, who develop self-control earlier and are better able to follow instructions, are often praised for their "goodness." When we do well in school, we are told that we are "so smart," "so clever," or "such a good student." This kind 50 of praise implies that traits like smartness, cleverness and goodness are qualities you either have or you don't. Boys, on the other hand, are a handful. Just trying to get boys to sit still and pay attention is a real challenge for any parent or teacher. As a result, boys are given feedback 55 that emphasizes effort (e.g., "If you would just pay attention you could learn this," "If you would just try a little harder you could get it right"). The result: when learning something new is difficult, girls take it as a sign that they aren't "good" and "smart," and boys take it as a 60 sign to try harder. We continue to carry these beliefs, often unconsciously, around with us throughout our lives. And because bright girls are particularly likely to see their abilities as innate and unchangeable, they grow up to be 65 women who are far too hard on themselves-women who will prematurely conclude that they don't have what it takes to succeed in a particular arena, and give up way too soon. Even if every external disadvantage is 70 removed-every inequality of opportunity, every chauvinistic stereotype, all the challenges we face balancing work and family-we would still have to deal with the fact that through our mistaken beliefs about our abilities, we may be our own worst enemy. 75 How often have you found yourself avoiding challenges and playing it safe, sticking to goals you knew would be easy for you to reach Are there things you decided long ago that you could never be good at Skills you believed you would never possess If the list is a 80 long one, you were probably one of the bright girls-and your belief that you are stuck being exactly as you are has done more to determine the course of your life than you probably ever imagined. No matter the ability-whether it's intelligence, 85 creativity, self-control, charm or athleticism-studies show them to be profoundly malleable. When it comes to mastering any skill, your experience, effort and persistence matter a lot. So if you were a bright girl, it's time to toss out your mistaken belief about how ability works, 90 embrace the fact that you can always improve and reclaim the confidence that you lost so long ago. The passage best supports which of the following as a possible solution to the confidence problems of bright adult women?

B. Encouraging women to reexamine their own views about the nature of ability

A. Removing inequalities of opportunity and chauvinistic stereotypes

C. Refraining from informing children of their IQs until they are much older

D. Teaching boys to develop self-control earlier

Reading Passage (3) Successful women know only too well that in any male-dominated profession, we often find ourselves at a disadvantage. We are routinely underestimated, underutilized and even underpaid. Studies show that women need 5 to perform at extraordinarily high levels just to appear moderately competent compared to our male coworkers. But in my experience, smart and talented women rarely realize that one of the toughest hurdles they'll have to overcome lies within. Compared with our male 10 colleagues, we judge our own abilities not only more harshly but fundamentally differently. Understanding why we do it is the first step to righting a terrible wrong. And to do that, we need to take a step back in time. Chances are good that if you are a successful professional 15 today, you were a pretty bright fifth grade girl. Psychologist Carol Dweck conducted a series of studies in the 1980s looking at how bright girls and boys in the fifth grade handled new, difficult and confusing material. She found that bright girls, when given something to 20 learn that was particularly foreign or complex, were quick to give up; the higher the girls' IQ, the more likely they were to throw in the towel. In fact, the straight-A girls showed the most helpless responses. Bright boys, on the other hand, saw the difficult material as a challenge, 25 and found it energizing. They were more likely to redouble their efforts than give up. Why does this happen What makes smart girls less confident when they should be the most confident kids in the room At the 5th-grade level, girls routinely 30 outperform boys in every subject, including math and science. So there were no differences between these boys and girls in ability, nor in past history of success. The only difference was how bright boys and girls interpreted difficulty-what it meant to them when material seemed 35 hard to learn. Bright girls were much quicker to doubt their ability, to lose confidence and to become less effective learners as a result. Researchers have uncovered the reason for this difference in how difficulty is interpreted: more often than 40 not, bright girls believe that their abilities are innate and unchangeable, while bright boys believe that they can develop ability through effort and practice. How do girls and boys develop these different views Most likely, it has to do with the kinds of feedback 45 we get from parents and teachers as children. Girls, who develop self-control earlier and are better able to follow instructions, are often praised for their "goodness." When we do well in school, we are told that we are "so smart," "so clever," or "such a good student." This kind 50 of praise implies that traits like smartness, cleverness and goodness are qualities you either have or you don't. Boys, on the other hand, are a handful. Just trying to get boys to sit still and pay attention is a real challenge for any parent or teacher. As a result, boys are given feedback 55 that emphasizes effort (e.g., "If you would just pay attention you could learn this," "If you would just try a little harder you could get it right"). The result: when learning something new is difficult, girls take it as a sign that they aren't "good" and "smart," and boys take it as a 60 sign to try harder. We continue to carry these beliefs, often unconsciously, around with us throughout our lives. And because bright girls are particularly likely to see their abilities as innate and unchangeable, they grow up to be 65 women who are far too hard on themselves-women who will prematurely conclude that they don't have what it takes to succeed in a particular arena, and give up way too soon. Even if every external disadvantage is 70 removed-every inequality of opportunity, every chauvinistic stereotype, all the challenges we face balancing work and family-we would still have to deal with the fact that through our mistaken beliefs about our abilities, we may be our own worst enemy. 75 How often have you found yourself avoiding challenges and playing it safe, sticking to goals you knew would be easy for you to reach Are there things you decided long ago that you could never be good at Skills you believed you would never possess If the list is a 80 long one, you were probably one of the bright girls-and your belief that you are stuck being exactly as you are has done more to determine the course of your life than you probably ever imagined. No matter the ability-whether it's intelligence, 85 creativity, self-control, charm or athleticism-studies show them to be profoundly malleable. When it comes to mastering any skill, your experience, effort and persistence matter a lot. So if you were a bright girl, it's time to toss out your mistaken belief about how ability works, 90 embrace the fact that you can always improve and reclaim the confidence that you lost so long ago. In the context of the passage, the statement in lines 7-9 most nearly means that:

D. many women don't realize that their own beliefs may be holding them back as much as the sexism of others.

A. the author believes that her experiences have made her uniquely qualified to address this subject matter.

B. smart women are harmed by the fact that they were not encouraged to participate in sports as young girls.

C. professional women often don't devote enough time to maintaining their emotional health.

Reading Passage (3) Successful women know only too well that in any male-dominated profession, we often find ourselves at a disadvantage. We are routinely underestimated, underutilized and even underpaid. Studies show that women need 5 to perform at extraordinarily high levels just to appear moderately competent compared to our male coworkers. But in my experience, smart and talented women rarely realize that one of the toughest hurdles they'll have to overcome lies within. Compared with our male 10 colleagues, we judge our own abilities not only more harshly but fundamentally differently. Understanding why we do it is the first step to righting a terrible wrong. And to do that, we need to take a step back in time. Chances are good that if you are a successful professional 15 today, you were a pretty bright fifth grade girl. Psychologist Carol Dweck conducted a series of studies in the 1980s looking at how bright girls and boys in the fifth grade handled new, difficult and confusing material. She found that bright girls, when given something to 20 learn that was particularly foreign or complex, were quick to give up; the higher the girls' IQ, the more likely they were to throw in the towel. In fact, the straight-A girls showed the most helpless responses. Bright boys, on the other hand, saw the difficult material as a challenge, 25 and found it energizing. They were more likely to redouble their efforts than give up. Why does this happen What makes smart girls less confident when they should be the most confident kids in the room At the 5th-grade level, girls routinely 30 outperform boys in every subject, including math and science. So there were no differences between these boys and girls in ability, nor in past history of success. The only difference was how bright boys and girls interpreted difficulty-what it meant to them when material seemed 35 hard to learn. Bright girls were much quicker to doubt their ability, to lose confidence and to become less effective learners as a result. Researchers have uncovered the reason for this difference in how difficulty is interpreted: more often than 40 not, bright girls believe that their abilities are innate and unchangeable, while bright boys believe that they can develop ability through effort and practice. How do girls and boys develop these different views Most likely, it has to do with the kinds of feedback 45 we get from parents and teachers as children. Girls, who develop self-control earlier and are better able to follow instructions, are often praised for their "goodness." When we do well in school, we are told that we are "so smart," "so clever," or "such a good student." This kind 50 of praise implies that traits like smartness, cleverness and goodness are qualities you either have or you don't. Boys, on the other hand, are a handful. Just trying to get boys to sit still and pay attention is a real challenge for any parent or teacher. As a result, boys are given feedback 55 that emphasizes effort (e.g., "If you would just pay attention you could learn this," "If you would just try a little harder you could get it right"). The result: when learning something new is difficult, girls take it as a sign that they aren't "good" and "smart," and boys take it as a 60 sign to try harder. We continue to carry these beliefs, often unconsciously, around with us throughout our lives. And because bright girls are particularly likely to see their abilities as innate and unchangeable, they grow up to be 65 women who are far too hard on themselves-women who will prematurely conclude that they don't have what it takes to succeed in a particular arena, and give up way too soon. Even if every external disadvantage is 70 removed-every inequality of opportunity, every chauvinistic stereotype, all the challenges we face balancing work and family-we would still have to deal with the fact that through our mistaken beliefs about our abilities, we may be our own worst enemy. 75 How often have you found yourself avoiding challenges and playing it safe, sticking to goals you knew would be easy for you to reach Are there things you decided long ago that you could never be good at Skills you believed you would never possess If the list is a 80 long one, you were probably one of the bright girls-and your belief that you are stuck being exactly as you are has done more to determine the course of your life than you probably ever imagined. No matter the ability-whether it's intelligence, 85 creativity, self-control, charm or athleticism-studies show them to be profoundly malleable. When it comes to mastering any skill, your experience, effort and persistence matter a lot. So if you were a bright girl, it's time to toss out your mistaken belief about how ability works, 90 embrace the fact that you can always improve and reclaim the confidence that you lost so long ago. The passage best supports which of the following claims about Carol Dweck's study?

F. It uncovered a problem in learning development unique to the smartest girls.

G. It found that IQ is a more accurate predictor of scholastic success in boys than in girls.

H. The methodology used to conduct the study was a great innovation for the time.

J. More recent research has uncovered possible flaws in its conclusions.

Reading Passage (3) Successful women know only too well that in any male-dominated profession, we often find ourselves at a disadvantage. We are routinely underestimated, underutilized and even underpaid. Studies show that women need 5 to perform at extraordinarily high levels just to appear moderately competent compared to our male coworkers. But in my experience, smart and talented women rarely realize that one of the toughest hurdles they'll have to overcome lies within. Compared with our male 10 colleagues, we judge our own abilities not only more harshly but fundamentally differently. Understanding why we do it is the first step to righting a terrible wrong. And to do that, we need to take a step back in time. Chances are good that if you are a successful professional 15 today, you were a pretty bright fifth grade girl. Psychologist Carol Dweck conducted a series of studies in the 1980s looking at how bright girls and boys in the fifth grade handled new, difficult and confusing material. She found that bright girls, when given something to 20 learn that was particularly foreign or complex, were quick to give up; the higher the girls' IQ, the more likely they were to throw in the towel. In fact, the straight-A girls showed the most helpless responses. Bright boys, on the other hand, saw the difficult material as a challenge, 25 and found it energizing. They were more likely to redouble their efforts than give up. Why does this happen What makes smart girls less confident when they should be the most confident kids in the room At the 5th-grade level, girls routinely 30 outperform boys in every subject, including math and science. So there were no differences between these boys and girls in ability, nor in past history of success. The only difference was how bright boys and girls interpreted difficulty-what it meant to them when material seemed 35 hard to learn. Bright girls were much quicker to doubt their ability, to lose confidence and to become less effective learners as a result. Researchers have uncovered the reason for this difference in how difficulty is interpreted: more often than 40 not, bright girls believe that their abilities are innate and unchangeable, while bright boys believe that they can develop ability through effort and practice. How do girls and boys develop these different views Most likely, it has to do with the kinds of feedback 45 we get from parents and teachers as children. Girls, who develop self-control earlier and are better able to follow instructions, are often praised for their "goodness." When we do well in school, we are told that we are "so smart," "so clever," or "such a good student." This kind 50 of praise implies that traits like smartness, cleverness and goodness are qualities you either have or you don't. Boys, on the other hand, are a handful. Just trying to get boys to sit still and pay attention is a real challenge for any parent or teacher. As a result, boys are given feedback 55 that emphasizes effort (e.g., "If you would just pay attention you could learn this," "If you would just try a little harder you could get it right"). The result: when learning something new is difficult, girls take it as a sign that they aren't "good" and "smart," and boys take it as a 60 sign to try harder. We continue to carry these beliefs, often unconsciously, around with us throughout our lives. And because bright girls are particularly likely to see their abilities as innate and unchangeable, they grow up to be 65 women who are far too hard on themselves-women who will prematurely conclude that they don't have what it takes to succeed in a particular arena, and give up way too soon. Even if every external disadvantage is 70 removed-every inequality of opportunity, every chauvinistic stereotype, all the challenges we face balancing work and family-we would still have to deal with the fact that through our mistaken beliefs about our abilities, we may be our own worst enemy. 75 How often have you found yourself avoiding challenges and playing it safe, sticking to goals you knew would be easy for you to reach Are there things you decided long ago that you could never be good at Skills you believed you would never possess If the list is a 80 long one, you were probably one of the bright girls-and your belief that you are stuck being exactly as you are has done more to determine the course of your life than you probably ever imagined. No matter the ability-whether it's intelligence, 85 creativity, self-control, charm or athleticism-studies show them to be profoundly malleable. When it comes to mastering any skill, your experience, effort and persistence matter a lot. So if you were a bright girl, it's time to toss out your mistaken belief about how ability works, 90 embrace the fact that you can always improve and reclaim the confidence that you lost so long ago. The passage mentions all of the following as differences between girls and boys EXCEPT:

C. which subjects they tend to excel at.

B. how easy they are to control.

D. the ways that adults talk to them.

Reading Passage (3) Successful women know only too well that in any male-dominated profession, we often find ourselves at a disadvantage. We are routinely underestimated, underutilized and even underpaid. Studies show that women need 5 to perform at extraordinarily high levels just to appear moderately competent compared to our male coworkers. But in my experience, smart and talented women rarely realize that one of the toughest hurdles they'll have to overcome lies within. Compared with our male 10 colleagues, we judge our own abilities not only more harshly but fundamentally differently. Understanding why we do it is the first step to righting a terrible wrong. And to do that, we need to take a step back in time. Chances are good that if you are a successful professional 15 today, you were a pretty bright fifth grade girl. Psychologist Carol Dweck conducted a series of studies in the 1980s looking at how bright girls and boys in the fifth grade handled new, difficult and confusing material. She found that bright girls, when given something to 20 learn that was particularly foreign or complex, were quick to give up; the higher the girls' IQ, the more likely they were to throw in the towel. In fact, the straight-A girls showed the most helpless responses. Bright boys, on the other hand, saw the difficult material as a challenge, 25 and found it energizing. They were more likely to redouble their efforts than give up. Why does this happen What makes smart girls less confident when they should be the most confident kids in the room At the 5th-grade level, girls routinely 30 outperform boys in every subject, including math and science. So there were no differences between these boys and girls in ability, nor in past history of success. The only difference was how bright boys and girls interpreted difficulty-what it meant to them when material seemed 35 hard to learn. Bright girls were much quicker to doubt their ability, to lose confidence and to become less effective learners as a result. Researchers have uncovered the reason for this difference in how difficulty is interpreted: more often than 40 not, bright girls believe that their abilities are innate and unchangeable, while bright boys believe that they can develop ability through effort and practice. How do girls and boys develop these different views Most likely, it has to do with the kinds of feedback 45 we get from parents and teachers as children. Girls, who develop self-control earlier and are better able to follow instructions, are often praised for their "goodness." When we do well in school, we are told that we are "so smart," "so clever," or "such a good student." This kind 50 of praise implies that traits like smartness, cleverness and goodness are qualities you either have or you don't. Boys, on the other hand, are a handful. Just trying to get boys to sit still and pay attention is a real challenge for any parent or teacher. As a result, boys are given feedback 55 that emphasizes effort (e.g., "If you would just pay attention you could learn this," "If you would just try a little harder you could get it right"). The result: when learning something new is difficult, girls take it as a sign that they aren't "good" and "smart," and boys take it as a 60 sign to try harder. We continue to carry these beliefs, often unconsciously, around with us throughout our lives. And because bright girls are particularly likely to see their abilities as innate and unchangeable, they grow up to be 65 women who are far too hard on themselves-women who will prematurely conclude that they don't have what it takes to succeed in a particular arena, and give up way too soon. Even if every external disadvantage is 70 removed-every inequality of opportunity, every chauvinistic stereotype, all the challenges we face balancing work and family-we would still have to deal with the fact that through our mistaken beliefs about our abilities, we may be our own worst enemy. 75 How often have you found yourself avoiding challenges and playing it safe, sticking to goals you knew would be easy for you to reach Are there things you decided long ago that you could never be good at Skills you believed you would never possess If the list is a 80 long one, you were probably one of the bright girls-and your belief that you are stuck being exactly as you are has done more to determine the course of your life than you probably ever imagined. No matter the ability-whether it's intelligence, 85 creativity, self-control, charm or athleticism-studies show them to be profoundly malleable. When it comes to mastering any skill, your experience, effort and persistence matter a lot. So if you were a bright girl, it's time to toss out your mistaken belief about how ability works, 90 embrace the fact that you can always improve and reclaim the confidence that you lost so long ago. According to the passage, success in overcoming challenges of all kinds is:

G. largely the result of self-image.

F. determined very early in life.

H. completely unrelated to gender.

AEPST - 10022984- Reading Skills

11th Grade

•

30 Qs

Similar activities

IPA - Session 6 - Review /b/ /p/ ; /s/ /z/ /ʃ/

KG - Professional Development

•

15 Qs

ANNUAL REVISION topic 4 - the heart of the city

6th - 12th Grade

•

12 Qs

gerund and infinitive

9th - 11th Grade

•

10 Qs

Unit 12 - Unit 13. Lớp 5

5th Grade - University

•

15 Qs

Nature is life and conservation

9th - 11th Grade

•

10 Qs

Appointment and Reservation

11th Grade

•

10 Qs

One word substitution

10th Grade - University

•

12 Qs

PERSONAL LETTER

11th Grade

•

10 Qs

AEPST - 10022984- Reading Skills

Quiz

•

English

•

11th Grade

•

Practice Problem

•

Hard

Mohamed Zaghloul

Used 1+ times

FREE Resource

30 questions

Show all answers

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Reading Passage (1)
(1) The factory whistle blared, its shrill cry echoing across the grimy streets and signaling the beginning of another long, grueling shift. Lena Petrov, a recent immigrant from Eastern Europe, pulled her thin shawl tighter around her shoulders as she navigated the cobblestone paths slick with rain and oil. The scent of machinery—a potent mix of grease, sweat, and burning coal—permeated the air, a cruel reminder of the world she now called home.
(2) Lena's life had transformed when she and her family fled their war-torn village, lured by tales of opportunity in America. Yet, those promises now seemed like bitter fables. In reality, opportunity meant endless days in the meatpacking plant, where the clatter of conveyor belts and the rhythmic thudding of cleavers formed an unforgiving symphony. The work was merciless: hands numb from cold, eyes stinging from the sharp, metallic tang of blood that never seemed to wash away.
(3) The foreman, a towering man with eyes as cold as steel, barked orders in a voice that cut through the din. There was no time for breaks, no space for errors. A mistake meant docked pay—or worse, dismissal. Lena had seen friends sent away for the smallest misstep, left to beg on street corners or disappear into the city's hidden corners where despair festered unchecked.
(4) At home, Lena’s mother tried to maintain the semblance of their former life, cooking meager stews over a sputtering flame and stitching their few clothes with care. Her father, once a proud craftsman, now spent his days in silence, staring blankly at his blistered palms. The American dream they had crossed oceans to chase had become a relentless nightmare of survival.
(5) But there were glimmers of defiance. Some workers whispered of union meetings held in basements lit by single candles. They spoke of fair wages and better conditions, ideas that seemed as impossible as the stars in the smog-laden sky. Yet, the thought kindled a tiny ember in Lena's chest—a spark that refused to be extinguished despite the darkness.
(6) Every day, as she wielded her knife with precision and gritted teeth, Lena repeated the silent mantra: There must be more than this. And with each whispered hope, the spark grew, an unspoken promise that one day, the symphony of machinery would be silenced, replaced by a song of freedom that even the factory’s iron walls could not contain.
What is the main idea of the passage?

To reveal terrible conditions in every American's professional life during a certain time in history

To display the main character's consistent suffering and torture at home and work , regardless of her willingness to return back to her homeland in Eastern Europe

To emphasize the mixed feelings of despair , suffering, and hope inside the main character , who is a recent immigrant to the USA

To discuss the job opportunity America used to offer with fair wages and ,sometimes, negative working atmosphere

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Reading Passage (1)
(1) The factory whistle blared, its shrill cry echoing across the grimy streets and signaling the beginning of another long, grueling shift. Lena Petrov, a recent immigrant from Eastern Europe, pulled her thin shawl tighter around her shoulders as she navigated the cobblestone paths slick with rain and oil. The scent of machinery—a potent mix of grease, sweat, and burning coal—permeated the air, a cruel reminder of the world she now called home.
(2) Lena's life had transformed when she and her family fled their war-torn village, lured by tales of opportunity in America. Yet, those promises now seemed like bitter fables. In reality, opportunity meant endless days in the meatpacking plant, where the clatter of conveyor belts and the rhythmic thudding of cleavers formed an unforgiving symphony. The work was merciless: hands numb from cold, eyes stinging from the sharp, metallic tang of blood that never seemed to wash away.
(3) The foreman, a towering man with eyes as cold as steel, barked orders in a voice that cut through the din. There was no time for breaks, no space for errors. A mistake meant docked pay—or worse, dismissal. Lena had seen friends sent away for the smallest misstep, left to beg on street corners or disappear into the city's hidden corners where despair festered unchecked.
(4) At home, Lena’s mother tried to maintain the semblance of their former life, cooking meager stews over a sputtering flame and stitching their few clothes with care. Her father, once a proud craftsman, now spent his days in silence, staring blankly at his blistered palms. The American dream they had crossed oceans to chase had become a relentless nightmare of survival.
(5) But there were glimmers of defiance. Some workers whispered of union meetings held in basements lit by single candles. They spoke of fair wages and better conditions, ideas that seemed as impossible as the stars in the smog-laden sky. Yet, the thought kindled a tiny ember in Lena's chest—a spark that refused to be extinguished despite the darkness.
(6) Every day, as she wielded her knife with precision and gritted teeth, Lena repeated the silent mantra: There must be more than this. And with each whispered hope, the spark grew, an unspoken promise that one day, the symphony of machinery would be silenced, replaced by a song of freedom that even the factory’s iron walls could not contain.
Based on how it's used in context, the word " barked" in paragraph 3 is used...:

figuratively in a positive way to describe the manner of one of the characters

literally to describe the one character's violent attitude

metaphorically to reveal the brutality of a character

literally to reveal the ,sometimes, welcoming conditions despite the aggressiveness of the foreman

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Reading Passage (1)
(1) The factory whistle blared, its shrill cry echoing across the grimy streets and signaling the beginning of another long, grueling shift. Lena Petrov, a recent immigrant from Eastern Europe, pulled her thin shawl tighter around her shoulders as she navigated the cobblestone paths slick with rain and oil. The scent of machinery—a potent mix of grease, sweat, and burning coal—permeated the air, a cruel reminder of the world she now called home.
(2) Lena's life had transformed when she and her family fled their war-torn village, lured by tales of opportunity in America. Yet, those promises now seemed like bitter fables. In reality, opportunity meant endless days in the meatpacking plant, where the clatter of conveyor belts and the rhythmic thudding of cleavers formed an unforgiving symphony. The work was merciless: hands numb from cold, eyes stinging from the sharp, metallic tang of blood that never seemed to wash away.
(3) The foreman, a towering man with eyes as cold as steel, barked orders in a voice that cut through the din. There was no time for breaks, no space for errors. A mistake meant docked pay—or worse, dismissal. Lena had seen friends sent away for the smallest misstep, left to beg on street corners or disappear into the city's hidden corners where despair festered unchecked.
(4) At home, Lena’s mother tried to maintain the semblance of their former life, cooking meager stews over a sputtering flame and stitching their few clothes with care. Her father, once a proud craftsman, now spent his days in silence, staring blankly at his blistered palms. The American dream they had crossed oceans to chase had become a relentless nightmare of survival.
(5) But there were glimmers of defiance. Some workers whispered of union meetings held in basements lit by single candles. They spoke of fair wages and better conditions, ideas that seemed as impossible as the stars in the smog-laden sky. Yet, the thought kindled a tiny ember in Lena's chest—a spark that refused to be extinguished despite the darkness.
(6) Every day, as she wielded her knife with precision and gritted teeth, Lena repeated the silent mantra: There must be more than this. And with each whispered hope, the spark grew, an unspoken promise that one day, the symphony of machinery would be silenced, replaced by a song of freedom that even the factory’s iron walls could not contain.
Which from the following facts IS NOT supported by the previous passage?

Lena's father's suffering after being in a good condition

Lena's hope for future fruitful achievements

Lena's life after and before getting married

Lena's poor clothing and diet due to meager wages she and her family receive

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

Reading Passage (1)
(1) The factory whistle blared, its shrill cry echoing across the grimy streets and signaling the beginning of another long, grueling shift. Lena Petrov, a recent immigrant from Eastern Europe, pulled her thin shawl tighter around her shoulders as she navigated the cobblestone paths slick with rain and oil. The scent of machinery—a potent mix of grease, sweat, and burning coal—permeated the air, a cruel reminder of the world she now called home.
(2) Lena's life had transformed when she and her family fled their war-torn village, lured by tales of opportunity in America. Yet, those promises now seemed like bitter fables. In reality, opportunity meant endless days in the meatpacking plant, where the clatter of conveyor belts and the rhythmic thudding of cleavers formed an unforgiving symphony. The work was merciless: hands numb from cold, eyes stinging from the sharp, metallic tang of blood that never seemed to wash away.
(3) The foreman, a towering man with eyes as cold as steel, barked orders in a voice that cut through the din. There was no time for breaks, no space for errors. A mistake meant docked pay—or worse, dismissal. Lena had seen friends sent away for the smallest misstep, left to beg on street corners or disappear into the city's hidden corners where despair festered unchecked.
(4) At home, Lena’s mother tried to maintain the semblance of their former life, cooking meager stews over a sputtering flame and stitching their few clothes with care. Her father, once a proud craftsman, now spent his days in silence, staring blankly at his blistered palms. The American dream they had crossed oceans to chase had become a relentless nightmare of survival.
(5) But there were glimmers of defiance. Some workers whispered of union meetings held in basements lit by single candles. They spoke of fair wages and better conditions, ideas that seemed as impossible as the stars in the smog-laden sky. Yet, the thought kindled a tiny ember in Lena's chest—a spark that refused to be extinguished despite the darkness.
(6) Every day, as she wielded her knife with precision and gritted teeth, Lena repeated the silent mantra: There must be more than this. And with each whispered hope, the spark grew, an unspoken promise that one day, the symphony of machinery would be silenced, replaced by a song of freedom that even the factory’s iron walls could not contain.
What is the main function of the fourth paragraph?

transition from discussing work conditions to the discussion of Lena's household conditions

Lena's family's life before arriving in the USA

Lena's mother's pathetic emotional suffering

Lena's everyday diet and clothes and how she managed to maintain them despite harsh financial difficulties

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Reading Passage (1)
(1) The factory whistle blared, its shrill cry echoing across the grimy streets and signaling the beginning of another long, grueling shift. Lena Petrov, a recent immigrant from Eastern Europe, pulled her thin shawl tighter around her shoulders as she navigated the cobblestone paths slick with rain and oil. The scent of machinery—a potent mix of grease, sweat, and burning coal—permeated the air, a cruel reminder of the world she now called home.
(2) Lena's life had transformed when she and her family fled their war-torn village, lured by tales of opportunity in America. Yet, those promises now seemed like bitter fables. In reality, opportunity meant endless days in the meatpacking plant, where the clatter of conveyor belts and the rhythmic thudding of cleavers formed an unforgiving symphony. The work was merciless: hands numb from cold, eyes stinging from the sharp, metallic tang of blood that never seemed to wash away.
(3) The foreman, a towering man with eyes as cold as steel, barked orders in a voice that cut through the din. There was no time for breaks, no space for errors. A mistake meant docked pay—or worse, dismissal. Lena had seen friends sent away for the smallest misstep, left to beg on street corners or disappear into the city's hidden corners where despair festered unchecked.
(4) At home, Lena’s mother tried to maintain the semblance of their former life, cooking meager stews over a sputtering flame and stitching their few clothes with care. Her father, once a proud craftsman, now spent his days in silence, staring blankly at his blistered palms. The American dream they had crossed oceans to chase had become a relentless nightmare of survival.
(5) But there were glimmers of defiance. Some workers whispered of union meetings held in basements lit by single candles. They spoke of fair wages and better conditions, ideas that seemed as impossible as the stars in the smog-laden sky. Yet, the thought kindled a tiny ember in Lena's chest—a spark that refused to be extinguished despite the darkness.
(6) Every day, as she wielded her knife with precision and gritted teeth, Lena repeated the silent mantra: There must be more than this. And with each whispered hope, the spark grew, an unspoken promise that one day, the symphony of machinery would be silenced, replaced by a song of freedom that even the factory’s iron walls could not contain.
It can be inferred that the simplest mistake at work could...:

cause people to be deported to their original mother countries

cause workers to be on the streets as paupers

to be continuously threatened by their bosses and intimidated by the business owners

to cause them to emotionally suffer from their wages deductions

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

Reading Passage (1)
(1) The factory whistle blared, its shrill cry echoing across the grimy streets and signaling the beginning of another long, grueling shift. Lena Petrov, a recent immigrant from Eastern Europe, pulled her thin shawl tighter around her shoulders as she navigated the cobblestone paths slick with rain and oil. The scent of machinery—a potent mix of grease, sweat, and burning coal—permeated the air, a cruel reminder of the world she now called home.
(2) Lena's life had transformed when she and her family fled their war-torn village, lured by tales of opportunity in America. Yet, those promises now seemed like bitter fables. In reality, opportunity meant endless days in the meatpacking plant, where the clatter of conveyor belts and the rhythmic thudding of cleavers formed an unforgiving symphony. The work was merciless: hands numb from cold, eyes stinging from the sharp, metallic tang of blood that never seemed to wash away.
(3) The foreman, a towering man with eyes as cold as steel, barked orders in a voice that cut through the din. There was no time for breaks, no space for errors. A mistake meant docked pay—or worse, dismissal. Lena had seen friends sent away for the smallest misstep, left to beg on street corners or disappear into the city's hidden corners where despair festered unchecked.
(4) At home, Lena’s mother tried to maintain the semblance of their former life, cooking meager stews over a sputtering flame and stitching their few clothes with care. Her father, once a proud craftsman, now spent his days in silence, staring blankly at his blistered palms. The American dream they had crossed oceans to chase had become a relentless nightmare of survival.
(5) But there were glimmers of defiance. Some workers whispered of union meetings held in basements lit by single candles. They spoke of fair wages and better conditions, ideas that seemed as impossible as the stars in the smog-laden sky. Yet, the thought kindled a tiny ember in Lena's chest—a spark that refused to be extinguished despite the darkness.
(6) Every day, as she wielded her knife with precision and gritted teeth, Lena repeated the silent mantra: There must be more than this. And with each whispered hope, the spark grew, an unspoken promise that one day, the symphony of machinery would be silenced, replaced by a song of freedom that even the factory’s iron walls could not contain.
It can be inferred that lena and her family left their country to the America due to which from the following causes?

they suffered financially there and were willing to improve the quality of their life

they had many emotional challenges due to lack of safety and comfort due to their poor jobs and harsh treatment by their business owners

the help they were promised to obtain by their relatives once they would arrive in the USA

the unstable life due to the war breaking out in their native village

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

Reading Passage (1)
(1) The factory whistle blared, its shrill cry echoing across the grimy streets and signaling the beginning of another long, grueling shift. Lena Petrov, a recent immigrant from Eastern Europe, pulled her thin shawl tighter around her shoulders as she navigated the cobblestone paths slick with rain and oil. The scent of machinery—a potent mix of grease, sweat, and burning coal—permeated the air, a cruel reminder of the world she now called home.
(2) Lena's life had transformed when she and her family fled their war-torn village, lured by tales of opportunity in America. Yet, those promises now seemed like bitter fables. In reality, opportunity meant endless days in the meatpacking plant, where the clatter of conveyor belts and the rhythmic thudding of cleavers formed an unforgiving symphony. The work was merciless: hands numb from cold, eyes stinging from the sharp, metallic tang of blood that never seemed to wash away.
(3) The foreman, a towering man with eyes as cold as steel, barked orders in a voice that cut through the din. There was no time for breaks, no space for errors. A mistake meant docked pay—or worse, dismissal. Lena had seen friends sent away for the smallest misstep, left to beg on street corners or disappear into the city's hidden corners where despair festered unchecked.
(4) At home, Lena’s mother tried to maintain the semblance of their former life, cooking meager stews over a sputtering flame and stitching their few clothes with care. Her father, once a proud craftsman, now spent his days in silence, staring blankly at his blistered palms. The American dream they had crossed oceans to chase had become a relentless nightmare of survival.
(5) But there were glimmers of defiance. Some workers whispered of union meetings held in basements lit by single candles. They spoke of fair wages and better conditions, ideas that seemed as impossible as the stars in the smog-laden sky. Yet, the thought kindled a tiny ember in Lena's chest—a spark that refused to be extinguished despite the darkness.
(6) Every day, as she wielded her knife with precision and gritted teeth, Lena repeated the silent mantra: There must be more than this. And with each whispered hope, the spark grew, an unspoken promise that one day, the symphony of machinery would be silenced, replaced by a song of freedom that even the factory’s iron walls could not contain.
Paragraph 5 is specifically discussing which from the following points?

hope and optimism in their tone when discussing what the future might hold for them

poor setting and lacking interest in any career

secret meetings and plotting against their current co-workers

manipulative and tricky future which they deceive themselves by dreaming about

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Reading Passage (1)
(1) The factory whistle blared, its shrill cry echoing across the grimy streets and signaling the beginning of another long, grueling shift. Lena Petrov, a recent immigrant from Eastern Europe, pulled her thin shawl tighter around her shoulders as she navigated the cobblestone paths slick with rain and oil. The scent of machinery—a potent mix of grease, sweat, and burning coal—permeated the air, a cruel reminder of the world she now called home.
(2) Lena's life had transformed when she and her family fled their war-torn village, lured by tales of opportunity in America. Yet, those promises now seemed like bitter fables. In reality, opportunity meant endless days in the meatpacking plant, where the clatter of conveyor belts and the rhythmic thudding of cleavers formed an unforgiving symphony. The work was merciless: hands numb from cold, eyes stinging from the sharp, metallic tang of blood that never seemed to wash away.
(3) The foreman, a towering man with eyes as cold as steel, barked orders in a voice that cut through the din. There was no time for breaks, no space for errors. A mistake meant docked pay—or worse, dismissal. Lena had seen friends sent away for the smallest misstep, left to beg on street corners or disappear into the city's hidden corners where despair festered unchecked.
(4) At home, Lena’s mother tried to maintain the semblance of their former life, cooking meager stews over a sputtering flame and stitching their few clothes with care. Her father, once a proud craftsman, now spent his days in silence, staring blankly at his blistered palms. The American dream they had crossed oceans to chase had become a relentless nightmare of survival.
(5) But there were glimmers of defiance. Some workers whispered of union meetings held in basements lit by single candles. They spoke of fair wages and better conditions, ideas that seemed as impossible as the stars in the smog-laden sky. Yet, the thought kindled a tiny ember in Lena's chest—a spark that refused to be extinguished despite the darkness.
(6) Every day, as she wielded her knife with precision and gritted teeth, Lena repeated the silent mantra: There must be more than this. And with each whispered hope, the spark grew, an unspoken promise that one day, the symphony of machinery would be silenced, replaced by a song of freedom that even the factory’s iron walls could not contain.
The phrase " she now called home" serves as...:

authentic expression of comfort and relief

manipulative expression of fake feeling of satisfaction and comfort

real feeling of belonging to America

ambivalent sensation of financial loss and spiritual win combined

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Reading Passage (1)
(1) The factory whistle blared, its shrill cry echoing across the grimy streets and signaling the beginning of another long, grueling shift. Lena Petrov, a recent immigrant from Eastern Europe, pulled her thin shawl tighter around her shoulders as she navigated the cobblestone paths slick with rain and oil. The scent of machinery—a potent mix of grease, sweat, and burning coal—permeated the air, a cruel reminder of the world she now called home.
(2) Lena's life had transformed when she and her family fled their war-torn village, lured by tales of opportunity in America. Yet, those promises now seemed like bitter fables. In reality, opportunity meant endless days in the meatpacking plant, where the clatter of conveyor belts and the rhythmic thudding of cleavers formed an unforgiving symphony. The work was merciless: hands numb from cold, eyes stinging from the sharp, metallic tang of blood that never seemed to wash away.
(3) The foreman, a towering man with eyes as cold as steel, barked orders in a voice that cut through the din. There was no time for breaks, no space for errors. A mistake meant docked pay—or worse, dismissal. Lena had seen friends sent away for the smallest misstep, left to beg on street corners or disappear into the city's hidden corners where despair festered unchecked.
(4) At home, Lena’s mother tried to maintain the semblance of their former life, cooking meager stews over a sputtering flame and stitching their few clothes with care. Her father, once a proud craftsman, now spent his days in silence, staring blankly at his blistered palms. The American dream they had crossed oceans to chase had become a relentless nightmare of survival.
(5) But there were glimmers of defiance. Some workers whispered of union meetings held in basements lit by single candles. They spoke of fair wages and better conditions, ideas that seemed as impossible as the stars in the smog-laden sky. Yet, the thought kindled a tiny ember in Lena's chest—a spark that refused to be extinguished despite the darkness.
(6) Every day, as she wielded her knife with precision and gritted teeth, Lena repeated the silent mantra: There must be more than this. And with each whispered hope, the spark grew, an unspoken promise that one day, the symphony of machinery would be silenced, replaced by a song of freedom that even the factory’s iron walls could not contain.
The word " blankly " ,as used in context , most nearly means...:

fearfully

enthusiastically

wistfully

furiously

10.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Reading Passage (1)
(1) The factory whistle blared, its shrill cry echoing across the grimy streets and signaling the beginning of another long, grueling shift. Lena Petrov, a recent immigrant from Eastern Europe, pulled her thin shawl tighter around her shoulders as she navigated the cobblestone paths slick with rain and oil. The scent of machinery—a potent mix of grease, sweat, and burning coal—permeated the air, a cruel reminder of the world she now called home.
(2) Lena's life had transformed when she and her family fled their war-torn village, lured by tales of opportunity in America. Yet, those promises now seemed like bitter fables. In reality, opportunity meant endless days in the meatpacking plant, where the clatter of conveyor belts and the rhythmic thudding of cleavers formed an unforgiving symphony. The work was merciless: hands numb from cold, eyes stinging from the sharp, metallic tang of blood that never seemed to wash away.
(3) The foreman, a towering man with eyes as cold as steel, barked orders in a voice that cut through the din. There was no time for breaks, no space for errors. A mistake meant docked pay—or worse, dismissal. Lena had seen friends sent away for the smallest misstep, left to beg on street corners or disappear into the city's hidden corners where despair festered unchecked.
(4) At home, Lena’s mother tried to maintain the semblance of their former life, cooking meager stews over a sputtering flame and stitching their few clothes with care. Her father, once a proud craftsman, now spent his days in silence, staring blankly at his blistered palms. The American dream they had crossed oceans to chase had become a relentless nightmare of survival.
(5) But there were glimmers of defiance. Some workers whispered of union meetings held in basements lit by single candles. They spoke of fair wages and better conditions, ideas that seemed as impossible as the stars in the smog-laden sky. Yet, the thought kindled a tiny ember in Lena's chest—a spark that refused to be extinguished despite the darkness.
(6) Every day, as she wielded her knife with precision and gritted teeth, Lena repeated the silent mantra: There must be more than this. And with each whispered hope, the spark grew, an unspoken promise that one day, the symphony of machinery would be silenced, replaced by a song of freedom that even the factory’s iron walls could not contain.
The last phrase in sentence (5) has what type of rhetorical device in order to empower the idea of hope ?

simile

hyperbole

appeal to logic

metaphor

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Apple

Others

Already have an account?

Similar Resources on Wayground

11 questions

The browning version

Quiz

•

11th Grade

10 questions

Vocabulary - Speakout Intermediate Unit 1

Quiz

•

7th Grade - Professio...

8 questions

Personal Attributes/ Employability Skills

Quiz

•

3rd - 11th Grade

10 questions

Our Future

Quiz

•

KG - 12th Grade

12 questions

Norman MacCaig - Basking Shark

Quiz

•

8th - 12th Grade

15 questions

ENA6 - NOUNS + PREPOSITIONS

Quiz

•

11th Grade

15 questions

Rigel A

Quiz

•

10th Grade - Professi...

15 questions

Practice - wh-question words

Quiz

•

10th - 11th Grade

Popular Resources on Wayground

5 questions

This is not a...winter edition (Drawing game)

Quiz

•

1st - 5th Grade

25 questions

Multiplication Facts

Quiz

•

5th Grade

10 questions

Identify Iconic Christmas Movie Scenes

Interactive video

•

6th - 10th Grade

20 questions

Christmas Trivia

Quiz

•

6th - 8th Grade

18 questions

Kids Christmas Trivia

Quiz

•

KG - 5th Grade

11 questions

How well do you know your Christmas Characters?

Lesson

•

3rd Grade

14 questions

Christmas Trivia

Quiz

•

5th Grade

20 questions

How the Grinch Stole Christmas

Quiz

•

5th Grade

Discover more resources for English

9 questions

The Art of the Haiku

Lesson

•

6th - 12th Grade

14 questions

2022 Frederick Douglass Review

Quiz

•

11th Grade

7 questions

SPARK 12/18/25

Lesson

•

9th - 12th Grade

16 questions

Rhetorical Appeals Quiz

Quiz

•

11th Grade

10 questions

Commas-Compound & Complex Sentences

Quiz

•

8th - 11th Grade

10 questions

The Best Christmas Pageant Ever Chapter 5

Quiz

•

KG - University

10 questions

ACT 3: Humanities Common Assessment

Quiz

•

9th - 12th Grade