First Amendment Rights Quiz

A protester burns a national flag during a peaceful rally to oppose government policies. Is this considered protected speech under the First Amendment?

• Yes, it is protected speech.

• No, it is not protected speech.

• Only if the protester obtained a permit.

• Only if it was done on private property.

Tags

CCSS.RI.9-10.8

A group of students at a public high school wear T-shirts with controversial slogans. The school asks them to change, citing potential disruption. Does this violate their First Amendment rights?

• Yes, the school is violating their rights.

• No, schools can restrict speech to maintain order.

• Yes, but only if the slogans are political.

• No, students have no free speech rights in schools.

Tags

CCSS.W.9-10.1

CCSS.W.9-10.1B

During a protest, a participant tears a flag in half. Police arrest the participant for desecrating a symbol of national pride. Is this a violation of their rights?

• Yes, they have the right to protest in this way.

• No, damaging a flag is always illegal.

• Yes, only if they were peaceful.

• No, because the flag is a protected symbol.

Tags

CCSS.W.9-10.1B

A singer alters the lyrics of the national anthem to include political commentary during a televised event. Can they be punished for this?

• Yes, altering the anthem is illegal.

• No, this is protected free speech.

• Yes, if the audience finds it offensive.

• No, only if it was done intentionally to provoke.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

A local artist creates a painting that depicts the flag in a way that some find offensive. A community group demands the artwork be removed. What should happen?

• The artwork must be removed immediately.

• The artist’s rights are protected under free speech.

• The group can sue the artist for defamation.

• The decision depends on the government’s opinion.

Tags

CCSS.W.9-10.1B

An individual burns a flag outside a government building without a permit. The city fines them for violating permit laws. Is this lawful?

• Yes, because the act violated local laws.

• No, because flag burning is protected free speech.

• Yes, but only if they were warned first.

• No, local laws cannot override free speech protections.

Tags

CCSS.W.9-10.1B

A business bans employees from discussing political issues, including flag desecration, during work hours. Is this allowed?

• Yes, private businesses can enforce such rules.

• No, employees have free speech rights everywhere.

• Yes, but only if they provide an alternative forum.

• No, businesses cannot limit political discussions.

Tags

CCSS.W.9-10.1

A filmmaker releases a movie that features scenes of a flag burning. Lawmakers propose a ban on the film. Would this be constitutional?

• Yes, because the scenes are offensive.

• No, the First Amendment protects the film.

• Yes, if the film incites violence.

• No, only if the flag burning was real.

Tags

CCSS.RI.9-10.8

CCSS.W.9-10.1

CCSS.W.9-10.1B

CCSS.SL.9-10.3

CCSS.RI.9-10.6

A college student posts a video online where they burn a flag as part of a class project. The university expels the student. Is this legal?

• Yes, universities can set their own policies.

• No, this violates the student’s free speech rights.

• Yes, if the video incited violence.

• No, only if it was part of a public protest.

Tags

CCSS.W.9-10.1B

A law is passed banning all acts of flag desecration, regardless of the intent. Is this law constitutional?

• Yes, because it protects national symbols.

• No, it violates the First Amendment.

• Yes, but only if Congress votes unanimously.

• No, unless the Supreme Court overturns precedent.

Tags

CCSS.RI.9-10.8

CCSS.W.9-10.1

CCSS.W.9-10.1B

CCSS.RI.9-10.6