Hanson 17 CH 6 Rebuilding ArgumentsQuiz

What is the key to victory in a debate according to the text?

• Presenting new arguments

• Rebuilding your arguments

• Ignoring opponent's responses

• Changing the topic

Answer explanation

The key to victory in a debate is 'Rebuilding your arguments.' This approach allows you to strengthen your position and effectively counter your opponent's points, making it crucial for success.

What should you consider your case as, according to the text?

• A fortress

• A vehicle

• A castle

• A ship

Answer explanation

According to the text, you should consider your case as a castle. This metaphor suggests that your case is a stronghold, providing protection and a sense of security, much like a castle does.

What are backup files used for in a debate?

• To introduce new topics

• To resupport and defend your case arguments

• To confuse the opponent

• To summarize the debate

Answer explanation

Backup files in a debate are essential for resupporting and defending your case arguments. They provide evidence and reinforcement for your points, helping to strengthen your position against opposing views.

What should you do with the evidence you did not use in your case?

• Discard it

• Use it to prepare backup briefs

• Share it with the opponent

• Ignore it

Answer explanation

Using unused evidence to prepare backup briefs is beneficial as it strengthens your case and provides additional support if needed. Discarding or ignoring it may lead to missed opportunities, while sharing it with the opponent is not advisable.

What is one reason to rebuild your arguments in a debate?

• To confuse your opponent

• To remind your judge of the argument you want to emphasize

• To avoid discussing your opponent's points

• To make the debate longer

Answer explanation

Rebuilding your arguments helps to remind the judge of key points you want to emphasize, reinforcing your position in the debate. This strategy is crucial for clarity and persuasion.

Which of the following is an example of adding arguments with your own analysis?

• "Boot camps do reduce crime"

• "Boot camps are irrelevant"

• "The Johnson evidence shows boot camps reduce crime rates by over 35%"

• "Boot camps are unnecessary"

Answer explanation

The correct choice, 'The Johnson evidence shows boot camps reduce crime rates by over 35%', provides specific evidence and analysis, demonstrating a clear argument supported by data, unlike the other options which lack analysis.

What should you do if your opponent responds with outdated evidence?

• Ignore their response

• Use your original argument to defeat their response

• Agree with their evidence

• Change the topic

Answer explanation

Using your original argument to defeat their response is effective because it allows you to reinforce your position and demonstrate the weaknesses in their outdated evidence, strengthening your overall argument.

My opponent did not respond to one of my arguments. What should I do?

• Ignore it and move on

• Restate the argument and show why it means you should win

• Change the topic

• Agree with the opponent

Answer explanation

Restating the argument allows you to emphasize its importance and demonstrate how it supports your position. Ignoring it or changing the topic weakens your case, while agreeing with the opponent undermines your argument.

What should I do if I drop an argument?

• Ignore the dropped argument

• Use another argument to defeat the opponent

• Argue that the dropped point is not important

• All of the above

Answer explanation

If you drop an argument, you can choose to ignore it, use another argument to counter your opponent, or argue that the dropped point is not significant. Therefore, 'All of the above' is the correct choice.

How do I respond to flaws my opponent claimed my argument had?

• Agree with the opponent

• Ignore the flaw

• Point out that the argument does not have a flaw or present new evidence

• Change the subject

Answer explanation

The best response is to point out that your argument does not have a flaw or to present new evidence. This approach strengthens your position and addresses the opponent's claims directly, rather than avoiding or conceding.