Geometry Proof

Since segment BD is part of both triangles, it is congruent to itself, what do we call this?

• Substitution

• Commutative

• Reflexive

• CPCTC

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

By what reasoning are the two triangles congruent?

• SSS

• SAS

• ASA

• The triangles are not congruent.

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

Are the triangles congruent, if yes, why?

• SSS

• SAS

• ASA

• Not Congruent

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

Given: ∠1 and ∠2 are supplementary. What can you conclude?

• Nothing

Tags

CCSS.7.G.B.5

Given: <1 and <2 are a linear pair. Conclusion: m<1 + m<2 = 180. What is the reason that allows you to draw that conclusion?

• Angle addition postulate

• Definition of straight angle

• Linear Pair Postulate

• Definition of supplementary

Tags

CCSS.7.G.B.5

Given: AB is the segment bisector of PQ. What conclusion can you draw?

• PF = QF

• F is the midpoint of PQ

• m<PFA = m<QFA

• <PFQ is a straight angle

Tags

CCSS.HSG.CO.C.10

What is the missing statement in the proof?

• Addition property

• Segment Addition Postulate

• Substitution property

• Transitive property

Given: B is the midpoint of AC. What should you conclude?

• AB + BC = AC

• AB = BC

• A is the segment bisector of BC

• ABC is a straight angle

Tags

CCSS.HSG.CO.C.10

What should you conclude by definition of perpendicular?

• <ORP is a right angle

• QR + RP = QP

• <ORQ and <ORP are complementary

Tags

CCSS.4.G.A.1

CCSS.HSG.CO.A.1

Given: <1 and <3 are vertical angles. What should you conclude by the vertical angles theorem?

• <1 and <2 are a linear pair

• <1 and <3 are right angles

• <2 and <4 are vertical angles

Tags

CCSS.7.G.B.5