Statement and Reason to Prove Triangles Congruent

Can the triangles be proven congruent?  If so, how?

• ASA

• Cannot be proven congruent

• SAS

• SSS

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

What missing piece of information is needed to prove the triangles congruent using ASA?

• GC = CD

• CE = CD

• ∠GCE≅∠BCE

• BD = GE

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

What missing piece of information is needed to prove the triangles congruent using SAS?

• NM = AM

• NL = CA

• ∠M≅∠B

• ∠N≅∠C

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

What postulate proves these triangles congruent?

• SAS

• CPCTC

• AAS

• ASA

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

What postulate proves these triangles congruent?

• SAS

• ASA

• AAS

• Not enough information

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

Why are these 2 triangles congruent according to your proof?

• ASA

• SAS

• SSS

• Cannot be determined

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

Identify the  missing statement or reason

• Given

• Vertical Angles Theorem

• Definition of Angle Bisector

• Alternate Interior Angles Theorem

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

What are the 2 missing pieces of information?

• Transitive Property, SAS(Side-Angle-Side)

• Reflexive Property, SAS(Side-Angle-Side)

• Transitive Property, SSS(Side-Side-Side)

• Reflexive Property, SSS(Side-Side-Side)

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

Identify the missing statement or reason

• Reflexive Property

• Definition of Midpoint

• Given

• Vertical Angles Theorem

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

Can the triangles be proven congruent?  If so, how?

• ASA

• AAS

• SAS

• Cannot be proven congruent

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5