Argument

In scientific research, what is the primary purpose of forming an argument?

• To persuade others without evidence

• To present a hypothesis based on evidence

• To create a debate among scientists

• To summarize previous research

Tags

NGSS.HS-LS2-6

NGSS.HS-LS4-2

Which of the following best describes a scientific argument?

• A personal opinion on a scientific topic

• A logical explanation supported by evidence

• A debate between two scientists

• A summary of scientific facts

Tags

NGSS.HS-LS3-2

NGSS.HS-PS4-3

In the context of a scientific experiment, what role does an argument play?

• It serves as the hypothesis to be tested

• It is the conclusion drawn from the data

• It is the method used to conduct the experiment

• It is the data collected during the experiment

Tags

NGSS.HS-LS4-1

NGSS.HS-PS1-2

Which component is essential for constructing a strong scientific argument?

• Anecdotal evidence

• Statistical data

• Personal beliefs

• Unverified sources

Tags

NGSS.HS-LS4-1

NGSS.HS-LS3-2

How does peer review contribute to scientific arguments?

• It ensures arguments are based on personal opinions

• It validates the evidence and reasoning

• It simplifies complex arguments

• It eliminates the need for evidence

Tags

NGSS.HS-LS4-1

NGSS.HS-PS1-2

What is the relationship between a scientific argument and a theory?

• Arguments are based on theories

• Theories are formed from validated arguments

• Arguments and theories are unrelated

• Theories disprove arguments

In a scientific context, what is an argument's main function?

• To challenge existing theories

• To provide evidence for a hypothesis

• To entertain the scientific community

• To summarize experimental procedures

Tags

NGSS.HS-LS3-2

NGSS.HS-LS2-6

Which of the following is a characteristic of a weak scientific argument?

• Based on empirical evidence

• Lacks supporting data

• Includes peer-reviewed sources

• Follows the scientific method

What is the significance of counterarguments in scientific discourse?

• They weaken the original argument

• They provide alternative perspectives

• They are irrelevant to scientific discussions

• They confirm the original argument

How can a scientific argument be strengthened?

• By ignoring contradictory evidence

• By including more anecdotal evidence

• By incorporating peer-reviewed research

• By simplifying complex data

Tags

NGSS.HS-LS4-1

NGSS.HS-PS1-2

NGSS.HS-ETS1-3