Supreme Court Cases

Supreme Court Cases

12th Grade

15 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Accounts chamber

Accounts chamber

University

10 Qs

Reading comprehension 1

Reading comprehension 1

University

17 Qs

I Dissent: Ruth Bader Ginsburg

I Dissent: Ruth Bader Ginsburg

7th Grade - University

15 Qs

Brown V. Board of education

Brown V. Board of education

5th - 12th Grade

11 Qs

Prelim Quiz 02 ELS EAP 412

Prelim Quiz 02 ELS EAP 412

University

15 Qs

Analyzing Arguments

Analyzing Arguments

8th Grade - University

15 Qs

Supreme Court Cases

Supreme Court Cases

Assessment

Quiz

English

12th Grade

Hard

CCSS
RI.8.1, RI.11-12.7, RI.11-12.4

+22

Standards-aligned

Created by

Sarah Williams

FREE Resource

15 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Education Law: the highest court that reviews rulings for a last resort of justice

Opinion

Plaintiff

Statute

Superior Court

Supreme Court

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Tinker v. Des Moines: The Des Moines Independent School District was the ___ in this case.

Plaintiff(s)

Defendant(s)

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Tinker v. Des Moines: John Tinker, Mary Beth Tinker, and Christopher Eckhardt were the ___ in this case.

Plaintiff(s)

Defendant(s)

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Tinker v. Des Moines: "conduct that conveys a message" is known as...

Tinker Test

Substantial disruption

Symbolic speech

First Amendment

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Tinker v. Des Moines: the guideline courts use to determine what school officials can and

cannot prohibit

Tinker Test

Substantial disruption

Symbolic speech

First Amendment

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.7

CCSS.RI.8.7

CCSS.RI.9-10.7

CCSS.RL.11-12.7

CCSS.RL.9-10.7

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

In paragraph 3 of the opinion, Chief Justice Warren summarizes the

nature and history of the cases being heard

arguments for and against hearing the cases.

history of Court rulings related to the Fourteenth Amendment.

deliberations of the justices with regard to the merits of the cases.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

According to paragraph 4 of the opinion, what reason did the plaintiffs give for wanting their cases heard before the Supreme Court?

Segregated schools needed to be made equal.

Segregated schools were not equal and could not be made equal.

Segregated schools offered equal education but not equal rights.

Segregated schools guaranteed them equal protection of the laws.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?