Analyzing Arguments Practice

Analyzing Arguments Practice

11th Grade

25 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Rhetorical Appeal (9th-12th English 3 Review)

Rhetorical Appeal (9th-12th English 3 Review)

9th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

Logical Reasoning

Logical Reasoning

6th Grade - University

25 Qs

Debate Vocabulary

Debate Vocabulary

6th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

exposition text 11th grade

exposition text 11th grade

11th Grade

22 Qs

Analytical Exposition Text

Analytical Exposition Text

11th Grade

25 Qs

AP Language Tri B: Final Exam Review

AP Language Tri B: Final Exam Review

9th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

Mid-Semester Review

Mid-Semester Review

11th Grade

20 Qs

Chapter 3 Vocabulary Part 1

Chapter 3 Vocabulary Part 1

11th - 12th Grade

21 Qs

Analyzing Arguments Practice

Analyzing Arguments Practice

Assessment

Quiz

English

11th Grade

Hard

CCSS
RI.8.8, RI.11-12.5, RI. 9-10.6

+26

Standards-aligned

Created by

Sarah Williams

FREE Resource

25 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

What is the logical fallacy in the following statement: 'If you don't support the new Supreme Court nomination, then you must not care about justice or the legal system'?

Slippery slope fallacy

Ad hominem fallacy

Appeal to authority fallacy

False dilemma or black-and-white fallacy

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Identify the rhetorical strategy used in the following argument: 'You should support this Supreme Court decision because everyone else does.'

Bandwagon appeal

Appeal to emotion

Appeal to authority

Appeal to tradition

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Analyze the structure of the argument in the following statement: 'If the Supreme Court imposes stricter regulations on campaign financing, then political candidates will rely less on large donations. Therefore, imposing stricter regulations on campaign financing is an effective way to reduce the influence of big money in politics.'

The argument is a comparison statement followed by a recommendation. It uses the form of 'If A, then B. Therefore, A is better than C.'

The argument is a conditional statement followed by a hypothesis. It uses the form of 'If A, then B. Therefore, A might lead to C.'

The structure of the argument is a cause and effect statement followed by a prediction. It uses the form of 'If A, then B. Therefore, A will result in C.'

The structure of the argument is a conditional statement followed by a conclusion. It uses the form of 'If A, then B. Therefore, A is effective for C.' This is a valid deductive argument.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

What logical fallacy is present in the argument: 'You can't prove that the Supreme Court's decisions are always just, so they must be inherently fair'?

Appeal to ignorance

Ad hominem

Circular reasoning

False cause

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Media Image

From the essay you read, what part of the argument is this?

Central claim

Reason

Evidence

Counterargument

Rebuttal

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Media Image

From the essay you read, what part of the argument is this?

Central claim

Reason

Evidence

Counterargument

Rebuttal

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Media Image

From the essay you read, what part of the argument is this?

Central claim

Reason

Evidence

Counterargument

Rebuttal

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?