
Logical Fallacies in Advertising
Authored by Sarah Williams
English
9th Grade
CCSS covered
Used 2+ times

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
15 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
__________ is a tactic used mainly in advertising that presents people as “authorities” on products or issues.
Straw Man
False Dilemma
False Authority
Post Hoc
Tags
CCSS.RI.8.8
CCSS.RI. 9-10.8
CCSS.RI.8.5
CCSS.RI.9-10.5
CCSS.RI.7.5
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
This is an example of what logic fallacy?
Appeal to Fear
Ad Hominem
Slippery Slope
Straw Man
Tags
CCSS.RI.8.8
CCSS.RI. 9-10.8
CCSS.RI.8.5
CCSS.RI.9-10.5
CCSS.RI.11-12.8
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
What is an error in logical reasoning in an argument or a persuasive text?
logical fallacy
factual error
rhetoric
Tags
CCSS.RI.8.8
CCSS.RI. 9-10.8
CCSS.RI.8.5
CCSS.RI.9-10.5
CCSS.RI.7.5
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
One of the most common fallacies used in advertising. Celebrities and doctors are used as people with opinions that should be trusted.Just because somebody “famous” or a “doctor” has an opinion, that doesn’t make it true.
Non-Sequitur
Either/Or (False Dichotomy)
Appeal to Authority
Appeal to Popularity (Bandwagon)
Tags
CCSS.RI.8.8
CCSS.RI.8.1
CCSS.RL.8.1
CCSS.RL.9-10.1
CCSS.RL.7.1
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
When the arguer encourages a belief or action because "everyone else is doing it."
Non-Sequitur
Either/Or (False Dichotomy)
Appeal to Authority
Appeal to Popularity (Bandwagon)
Tags
CCSS.RI.8.8
CCSS.RI.8.1
CCSS.RL.8.1
CCSS.RL.9-10.1
CCSS.RI.7.8
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
Which fallacy is this? McDonalds ' burgers must be good; Michael Jordan eats them.
Non-Sequitur
Either/Or (False Dichotomy)
Appeal to Authority
Appeal to Popularity (Bandwagon)
Tags
CCSS.RI.8.8
CCSS.RI.8.1
CCSS.RL.8.1
CCSS.RL.9-10.1
CCSS.RI.7.1
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
When a person makes sweeping statements based on too little or biased evidence.
Post Hoc (Cause/Effect)
Ad Hominem
Circular Reasoning
Hasty Generalization
Tags
CCSS.RI.8.8
CCSS.RI.8.1
CCSS.RL.8.1
CCSS.RL.9-10.1
CCSS.RL.7.1
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?