Types of Reasoning

Why is it important to understand the different types of reasoning?

• Reasoning skills are not applicable in real-life situations

• It is important to understand the different types of reasoning to make informed decisions, solve problems effectively, and communicate ideas clearly.

• Understanding different types of reasoning is irrelevant

• It is better to rely on intuition rather than reasoning

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.1

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.7.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

What type of reasoning starts with a general statement and applies it to a specific case?

• Abductive reasoning

• Inductive reasoning

• Deductive reasoning

• Analogical reasoning

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.1

CCSS.RI.7.8

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.8.1

Which type of reasoning uses specific observations to make generalizations?

• Abductive reasoning

• Deductive reasoning

• Analogical reasoning

• Inductive reasoning

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.8

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Which type of reasoning is often used in scientific research to form hypotheses?

• Deductive reasoning

• Inductive reasoning

• Analogical reasoning

• Abductive reasoning

What is the process of reasoning that involves moving from specific observations to a general conclusion?

• Circular reasoning

• Abductive reasoning

• Deductive reasoning

• Inductive reasoning

How is abductive reasoning different from deductive and inductive reasoning?

• Abductive reasoning relies on general principles to make predictions.

• Abductive reasoning focuses on forming the most likely explanation for a set of observations.

• Abductive reasoning involves testing hypotheses through experimentation.

• Abductive reasoning focuses on proving a specific conclusion.

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.8

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

True or False: Inductive reasoning relies on probability rather than certainty.

• False

• True

• Maybe

• Occasionally

Give an example of deductive reasoning.

• All apples are fruits. Oranges are fruits. Therefore, oranges are apples.

• All humans are mortal. Socrates is a human. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.

• All birds can fly. Penguins are birds. Therefore, penguins can fly.

• All dogs are mammals. Fido is a dog. Therefore, Fido is a mammal.

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.8

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.7.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

This type of reasoning starts with smaller facts or examples that lead to larger, general conclusions. The bigger, general conclusion may or may not be true.

• Abductive

• Deductive

• Inductive

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.8

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.7.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

This type of reasoning begins with a general rule or fact and then creates specific conclusions based on the general fact. The specific ideas will be correct as long as the general idea is true.

• Abductive

• Deductive

• Inductive

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.8

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.7.1

CCSS.RL.8.1