Search Header Logo

Engel v. Vitale

Authored by John Robinson

Social Studies

11th Grade

25 Questions

Engel v. Vitale
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

School sponsorship of religious activities (teacher led / directed prayer) violates the establishment clause

Tinker v. Des Moines

Engel v. Vitale

Wisconsin v. Yoder

Schenck v. United States

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

School district allowed students to vote on whether to read a prayer before 1st period. This violates what?

Commerce Clause

Free Exercise Clause

Supremacy Clause

Establishment Clause

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

What was the main argument of the plaintiffs in the Engel v. Vitale case?

The prayer was beneficial for students

The prayer was a long-standing tradition

The prayer violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment

The prayer was non-denominational and voluntary

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

What was the U.S. Supreme Court's decision regarding the New York school prayer?

It was constitutional as it was voluntary

It was unconstitutional as it established an official religion

It was a necessary tradition

It was beneficial for moral education

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

What impact did the Engel v. Vitale decision have on future court rulings?

It had no impact on future cases

It encouraged states to establish official religions

It banned similar non-denominational prayers in schools

It allowed more religious activities in schools

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

What was the New York Supreme Court's initial ruling on the school prayer?

It was harmful to students

It violated the Establishment Clause

It was constitutional because it was voluntary and non-denominational

It was unconstitutional due to its coercive nature

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

What was Justice Potter Stewart's stance on the school prayer?

He argued it was coercive

He supported banning all public prayers

He thought it was voluntary and non-denominational, thus constitutional

He believed it was unconstitutional

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?