Staar Supreme Court Cases

said that The Supreme Court had the right to review all laws made by Congress; established the idea of Judicial Review.

• Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)

• Worcester v, Georgia (1832)

• McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

• Marbury v. Madison (1803)

said that African-Americans were not citizens of the U.S. and said that Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional.

• Worcester v, Georgia (1832)

• Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)

• McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

• Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)

One of the most influential Supreme Court Justices; he helped establish the idea of Judicial Review which made the Supreme Court the powerful institution it is today.

• Daniel Webster

• Eli Whitney

• John Marshall

• Samuel Morse

said that federal government had the power to regulate trade between states.

• Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)

• Worcester v, Georgia (1832)

• Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)

• Marbury v. Madison (1803)

said that state could not tax a national bank; increased the power of the national government.

• Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)

• Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)

• McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

• Worcester v, Georgia (1832)

No cruel and unusual punishment, excessive bail.

• 7th Amendment

• 5th Amendment

• 8th Amendment

• 10th Amendment

This court case established Judicial Review by declaring the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional. This made the Supreme Court the final authority in deciding what laws and the Constitution means.

• Marbury v. Madison

• Ogden v. Gibbons

• McCulloch v. Maryland

• Dredd Scott v Sanford

What was the result of Worcester v Georgia?

• the Cherokee Nation was a country and could not be governed by another country (United States)

• all Cherokee lands must be given to the U.S.

• Worcester must sign an oath to Georgia or be arrested

• Worcester must sign an oath to the Cherokee or be arrested

Ruled slaves could never be U.S. citizens

• Dred Scott v. Sandford

• Marbury v. Madison

• Gibbons v. Ogden

• McCulloch v. Maryland

What did the Supreme Court rule in Dred Scott v. Sandford?

• Dred Scott was set free since he lived in a free state. Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional.

• Dred Scott was property and not a citizen. Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional.

• Dred Scott's owners were guilty of holding him against his will and were arrested. Missouri Compromise was constitutional.

• Dred Scott's owners had to pay Dred Scott for work he completed. Missouri Compromise was constitutional.