Sinn Fein pledge to investigate RTE deemed ‘dog whistle to conspiracy theorists’

The transcript discusses the potential dangers of a political party proposing an independent review of Orti's objectivity and news coverage. It argues that such a move could undermine media freedom, intimidate journalists, and serve as a dog whistle to conspiracy theorists. The speaker warns against political parties setting up committees to investigate the media, suggesting it could threaten media objectivity and freedom.

What is the speaker's view on a political party proposing an independent review of Orti's objectivity?

• It is a minor issue.

• It is an unlikely scenario in a functioning democracy.

• It is a common practice in democracies.

• It is a necessary step for transparency.

According to the speaker, what does suggesting an independent review of Orti imply?

• It supports media freedom.

• It encourages journalistic integrity.

• It is a neutral action.

• It is a tactic to undermine media freedom.

What does the speaker believe is the intention behind intimidating journalists?

• To discourage them from their work.

• To ensure accurate news coverage.

• To support investigative journalism.

• To promote unbiased reporting.

What is the potential consequence of political parties setting up committees to investigate the media?

• It enhances media objectivity.

• It poses a threat to media freedom.

• It has no significant impact.

• It improves public trust in media.

What does the speaker suggest about Sinn Fein's approach to media that doesn't align with their views?

• They propose investigating non-aligned media.

• They ignore differing views.

• They encourage open dialogue.

• They support diverse opinions.