Exploring Act 2 of 12 Angry Men

What is the primary conflict among the jurors in Act 2?

• Differing opinions on evidence and biases.

• Personal relationships among jurors are the main issue.

• The jurors are debating the judge's instructions.

• Jurors agree on all evidence presented.

How does Juror 8 continue to influence the other jurors' opinions?

• Juror 8 influences the other jurors by using logical reasoning and fostering open discussion.

• Juror 8 uses emotional appeals to sway the jurors.

• Juror 8 remains silent and lets others decide.

• Juror 8 threatens the other jurors to change their votes.

Which juror becomes increasingly aggressive in Act 2?

• Juror 1

• Juror 7

• Juror 3

• Juror 5

What evidence does Juror 8 present to challenge the prosecution's case?

• Juror 8 challenges the prosecution's case by questioning eyewitness reliability and pointing out inconsistencies in testimonies.

• Juror 8 presents a solid alibi for the defendant.

• Juror 8 claims the jury should trust the prosecutor's argument.

• Juror 8 argues that the defendant has a criminal record.

How does the group dynamic change as discussions progress in Act 2?

• The group becomes more argumentative and divided as discussions progress.

• The group dynamic remains static and unchanging throughout the discussions.

• The group dynamic becomes more collaborative and cohesive as discussions progress.

• The group becomes less engaged and more dismissive of each other's ideas.

What role does reasonable doubt play in the jurors' deliberations?

• Reasonable doubt means jurors can ignore evidence if they feel like it.

• Reasonable doubt ensures that jurors only convict if they are fully convinced of guilt, protecting the rights of the accused.

• Reasonable doubt is only relevant in civil cases, not criminal cases.

• Reasonable doubt allows jurors to convict without sufficient evidence.

Which juror's background influences their perspective on the case?

• Juror 1

• Juror 4

• Juror 10

• Juror 7

How does the setting of the jury room contribute to the tension in Act 2?

• The setting of the jury room contributes to the tension by creating a claustrophobic atmosphere that amplifies emotions and conflicts among jurors.

• The setting is filled with natural light, reducing tension.

• The jurors are seated in a circle, promoting harmony.

• The jury room is spacious, allowing for open discussions.

What is the significance of the vote taken in Act 2?

• The vote represents a crucial turning point in the narrative, showcasing the characters' collective decision-making process.

• The vote determines the winner of a competition.

• The vote is a formality with no real impact on the story.

• The vote is solely about personal preferences of the characters.

How do personal biases affect the jurors' decision-making process?

• Jurors are trained to eliminate personal biases completely.

• Personal biases only affect the judge's decision, not the jurors'.

• Personal biases can distort jurors' interpretations of evidence and influence their verdicts.

• Personal biases have no impact on jurors' decisions.