Untitled

The transcript discusses Liszt's affinity for giving evocative titles to his works, often inspired by literature. However, his Sonata in B Minor is an exception, with an abstract title that allows for diverse interpretations. The piece's lack of a specific programmatic title, such as 'Faust Sonata,' prevents it from being limited to a single narrative, enabling listeners to explore it in various ways, from spiritual to passionate or virtuosic interpretations. This flexibility makes the Sonata perpetually engaging for both listeners and performers.

What was the composer's approach to titling his works?

• He used numerical titles only.

• He used titles inspired by literature.

• He avoided titles altogether.

• He preferred abstract titles.

Why did the composer choose an abstract title for his masterpiece?

• To avoid limiting its interpretation.

• To honor another composer.

• To make it sound more mysterious.

• To follow a trend of the time.

What is a potential downside of giving a programmatic title like 'Faust Sonata'?

• It could confuse the audience.

• It would make the piece too long.

• It might restrict the piece's exploration.

• It could make the piece less popular.

How can the Sonata in B Minor be interpreted?

• In various ways, including noble and passionate.

• As a simple and straightforward piece.

• Only as a piece of great virtuosity.

• Only in a spiritual way.

What makes the Sonata in B Minor timeless?

• Its versatility and openness to exploration.

• Its ability to be played quickly.

• Its fixed interpretation.

• Its short duration.