Stephen Toulmin

Who was Stephen Toulmin?

• A) A British philosopher who developed a model of practical reasoning.

• B) An American scientist known for his work in physics.

• C) A French artist famous for his paintings.

• D) An Italian chef renowned for his culinary skills.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

What is Toulmin's model of reasoning similar to?

• Informal logic

• Formal logic, including the syllogism

• Mathematical reasoning

• Scientific method

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

What is a syllogism an example of?

• Informal logic

• Formal logic

• Deductive reasoning

• Inductive reasoning

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Fill in the blank: A syllogism comprises three parts: Major premise, Minor premise, and ________.

• Conclusion

• Introduction

• Hypothesis

• Assumption

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Which of the following is a correct example of a syllogism?

• A) All men are mortal, Socrates is a man, Therefore, Socrates is mortal

• B) All mammals have tails, a lizard has a tail, Therefore, a lizard is a mammal

• C) All cars are vehicles, Some vehicles are trucks, Therefore, all cars are trucks

• D) All dogs are animals, Some animals are cats, Therefore, all dogs are cats

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

The major premise is a ________, a broad proposition.

• generalization

• specificity

• detail

• exception

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

The minor premise is a specific ________ of the major premise.

• application

• example

• instance

• part

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

The conclusion ________ from the premises.

• follows logically

• does not follow

• is unrelated

• contradicts

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

What would be the syllogism for the following statement: Gen Z was the last generation to have a childhood because those children played outside.

• Gen Z are children

  Gen Z played outside

  Therefore, Gen Z are had a childhood

• Chilhood means going outside

  Gen Z was last generation to go outside

  Gen Z was the last to have a childhood

• Gen Z had a childhood

  A child has to go outside

  Therefore, Gen Z went outside

• All children play otuside

  Genz are children

  Gen Z play outside

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

What is the correct order of a syllogism?

• Major Premise

  Conclusion

  Minor Premise

• Minor Premise

  Major Premise

  Conclusion

• Major Premise

  Minor Premise

  Conclusion

• Conclusion

  Premise

  Minor Premise

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1