Flag Burning Quizizz

Thesis: The burning of the flag should be legal in the United States and protected under the first amendment.

Which statement from Texas v. Johnson Majority Opinion best illustrates the use of a rebuttal?

• "The way to preserve the flag’s special role is not to punish those who feel differently about these matters."

• "The government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable."

• "The First Amendment literally forbids the establishment of religion, and yet patriotic customs frequently refer to God."

• "We do not consecrate the flag by punishing its desecration, for in doing so, we dilute the freedom that this cherished emblem represents."

In paragraph 11, the author acknowledges concerns about flag desecration but argues against legal punishment. Which statement best represents a concession made in the opinion?

• "The hard fact is that sometimes we must make decisions we find unpleasant."

• "We do not doubt that the government has a legitimate interest in preserving the flag as a symbol of national unity."

• "It is poignant but fundamental that the flag protects those who hold it in contempt."

• "Our decision is a reaffirmation of the principles of freedom and tolerance."

Which statement from paragraph 3 of American Flag Stands for Tolerance represents the author's central claim?

• "I do not approve of flag burning, but I will defend the right of those who choose to do so."

• "The United States stands as a symbol of freedom, and that includes the freedom to dissent."

• "Punishing flag desecration contradicts the very principles the flag represents."

• "Justice Brennan and the Supreme Court made the right decision in protecting flag burning as free speech."

How does Ronald J. Allen refute the argument that flag burning should be punished in paragraph 5?

• By arguing that most Americans do not support flag desecration

• By stating that true patriotism tolerates even offensive speech

• By asserting that protestors should use other methods to express dissent

• By highlighting that flag burning has never been common in U.S. history

Which rhetorical strategy does Ronald J. Allen use in paragraph 4 to persuade readers that banning flag burning is dangerous?

• Logical reasoning by citing past Supreme Court cases

• Emotional appeal by sharing a personal experience with the flag

• Ethical appeal by referencing the Constitution and Bill of Rights

• Fear appeal by warning of an authoritarian government

In paragraph 4, Allen acknowledges that many Americans are offended by flag burning. Why does he include this point?

• To argue that flag burning should be illegal

• To show he understands opposing viewpoints before countering them

• To suggest that patriotism should outweigh constitutional rights

• To propose alternative ways for protestors to express themselves

What counterargument does American Flag Stands for Tolerance provide in paragraph 8 to the idea that banning flag desecration strengthens national unity?

• Punishing flag burning could set a precedent for restricting other forms of protest.

• The American flag is rarely burned, so laws against it are unnecessary.

• National unity is better preserved by eliminating protest altogether.

• Supreme Court justices have already determined the law on this issue.

How do Texas v. Johnson Majority Opinion and American Flag Stands for Tolerance differ in their approach to defending free speech?

• Texas v. Johnson focuses on legal precedent, while American Flag Stands for Tolerance emphasizes moral principles.

• Texas v. Johnson provides emotional appeals, while American Flag Stands for Tolerance relies solely on logic.

• Texas v. Johnson uses hypothetical scenarios, while American Flag Stands for Tolerance includes personal anecdotes.

• Texas v. Johnson argues for stricter laws, while American Flag Stands for Tolerance calls for absolute free speech.

What common theme is found in both Texas v. Johnson Majority Opinion and American Flag Stands for Tolerance?

• True patriotism requires tolerance of dissenting views.

• The American flag should be protected at all costs.

• Freedom of speech applies only to non-offensive expression.

• The Supreme Court does not have the authority to decide First Amendment issues.

Which argument do both texts use to support their stance on flag burning?

• The government should not legislate patriotism.

• Flag desecration is an ineffective form of protest.

• Citizens should have to explain their protest before burning the flag.

• Flag burning is only controversial in times of war.