Evaluating Source Credibility Quiz

You find an article on climate change written by a well-known scientist in a peer-reviewed journal. Is this source credible?

• Yes, because it is written by an expert and published in a peer-reviewed journal

• No, because it is not published on a popular website

• Yes, because it is entertaining

• No, because it is too technical

Answer explanation

Yes, the source is credible because it is authored by a well-known scientist, indicating expertise, and it is published in a peer-reviewed journal, which ensures the research has been evaluated for quality and accuracy.

Tags

CCSS.W.11-12.8

A blog post claims that a new diet can cure all diseases. The author is a medical professional and provides evidence that is exclusively from the manufacturer of the medicine. Is this source credible?

• Yes, because it offers a simple solution

• No, because the author lacks evidence and is selling something

• Yes, because it is easy to understand

• No, because it is too lengthy

Answer explanation

Credible sources should be backed by qualified professionals and scientific research, which this blog post does not provide. Blog posts in general are not credible since they do not go through a review process.

Tags

CCSS.W.11-12.8

A news website publishes an article about a recent scientific discovery. The article includes interviews with the scientists involved and references to the original research. Is this source credible?

• Yes, because it includes expert interviews and references

• No, because it is not a primary source

• Yes, because it is published online

• No, because it is not entertaining

Answer explanation

Yes, the source is credible because it includes expert interviews and references to the original research, which adds reliability and context to the scientific discovery reported.

Tags

CCSS.W.11-12.8

A social media post claims that a celebrity endorses a particular product. The post does not provide any evidence or links to credible sources. Is this source credible?

• Yes, because it involves a celebrity

• No, because it lacks evidence and credible sources

• Yes, because it is popular

• No, because it is too short

Answer explanation

The source is not credible because it lacks evidence and credible sources to support the claim of celebrity endorsement. Popularity or celebrity involvement alone does not guarantee reliability.

Tags

CCSS.W.11-12.8

An academic paper published in a reputable journal includes a comprehensive list of references and has been cited by other researchers. Is this source credible?

• Yes, because it is well-researched and cited by others

• No, because it is too complex

• Yes, because it is lengthy

• No, because it is not entertaining

Answer explanation

Yes, the source is credible because it is well-researched and has been cited by other researchers, indicating its reliability and relevance in the academic community.

Tags

CCSS.W.11-12.8

A website selling health supplements claims that their products are scientifically proven to work, but does not provide any scientific studies or references. Is this source credible?

• Yes, because it is a commercial website

• No, because it lacks scientific evidence and references

• Yes, because it is persuasive

• No, because it is too technical

Answer explanation

The source is not credible because it claims scientific proof without providing any studies or references. Credibility requires evidence to support claims, which this website lacks.

Tags

CCSS.W.11-12.8

A government report on public health statistics is available on an official government website. Is this source credible?

• Yes, because it is published by a government agency

• No, because it is not entertaining

• Yes, because it is lengthy

• No, because it is not a blog post

Answer explanation

Yes, the source is credible because it is published by a government agency, which typically ensures accuracy and reliability in public health statistics.

Tags

CCSS.W.11-12.8

An article in a tabloid newspaper claims that aliens have been discovered on Mars. The article does not cite any scientific sources or experts. Is this source credible?

• Yes, because it is exciting

• No, because it is not from a credible source

• Yes, because it is published in a newspaper

• No, because it is too short

Answer explanation

The article lacks credible sources and expert opinions, which are essential for establishing credibility, especially for extraordinary claims like alien discoveries.

Tags

CCSS.W.11-12.8

A YouTube video claims that a new technology can solve global warming and it shows facts from another YouTube video and the website of maker of the technology. Is this source credible?

• Yes, because it is a video

• No, because it lacks scientific evidence and expert opinions

• Yes, because it is popular

• No, because it is a YouTube video

Answer explanation

The source is not credible because it lacks scientific evidence and expert opinions, which are essential for validating claims about technology that can solve global warming.

Tags

CCSS.W.11-12.8

A textbook used in a university course provides an overview of historical events with references to primary sources. Is this source credible?

• Yes, because it is used in an academic setting and references primary sources

• No, because it is not a primary source

• Yes, because it is lengthy

• No, because it is not entertaining

Answer explanation

Yes, the textbook uses multiple highly credible authors and goes through an extensive review process.

Tags

CCSS.W.11-12.8