Space Exploration - Diction and Syntax

How does Jemison’s choice of the word "inclusive" contribute to the tone of the passage?

• It creates a sense of exclusivity and distance between the public and space exploration.

• It establishes an open and welcoming tone, suggesting that space exploration should involve everyone.

• It implies that only certain groups should participate in space missions.

• It focuses on the technical aspects of space exploration, excluding social considerations.

Tags

CCSS.RL.2.6

CCSS.RL.8.3

What effect does Jemison’s use of the phrase “extraordinary tomorrow” have on her argument?

• It implies that space exploration is a distant and unachievable goal.

• It emphasizes a future filled with potential, inspiring hope for what space exploration can bring.

• It creates a sense of urgency, suggesting that space exploration must be done immediately.

• It downplays the importance of the future, focusing more on immediate technological advancements.

Tags

CCSS.L.1.6

CCSS.L.3.6

CCSS.L.K.5A

How does Jemison’s use of the sentence “The reason we’re not on the moon has nothing to do with technology and everything to do with public will and commitment” enhance her argument?

• It simplifies the argument by focusing solely on technological limitations.

• It shifts the focus to the public’s role, emphasizing that space exploration requires public support.

• It reduces the complexity of space exploration by downplaying the role of technology.

• It suggests that space exploration should be postponed until all technological issues are resolved.

What is the impact of Jemison’s use of the word “commitment” in her argument?

• It highlights the temporary nature of public interest in space exploration.

• It emphasizes that long-term dedication is essential for the success of space missions.

How does the sentence structure in "The public did not leave space; the public was left out of space" affect the reader’s understanding?

• It creates a sense of frustration and exclusion, reinforcing the need for greater public involvement.

• It simplifies the message, making the argument sound less compelling.

• It minimizes the significance of public participation in space exploration.

• It adds complexity, making the argument harder to follow.

Tags

CCSS.L.4.5

CCSS.L.5.5

How does Jemison’s use of “extraordinary tomorrow” in the context of space exploration affect the reader’s perception of the future?

• It portrays space exploration as a long, uncertain journey that may never come to fruition.

• It paints a hopeful picture of space exploration’s potential, encouraging optimism about the future.

• It makes the future of space exploration seem irrelevant to current issues on Earth.

• It suggests that space exploration is an outdated goal, no longer worth pursuing.

Tags

CCSS.L.1.6

CCSS.L.3.6

CCSS.L.K.5A

How does the syntax of “The public did not leave space; the public was left out of space” influence the argument?

• The syntax emphasizes the public's role in space exploration, suggesting that they have been unfairly excluded.

• The syntax creates confusion by repeating the word "public" too many times.

• The syntax reduces the argument’s effectiveness by focusing on trivial details.

• The syntax makes the message sound less urgent, reducing its impact.

What is the effect of Jemison’s repetition of “public” in “The public did not leave space; the public was left out of space”?

• It draws attention to the public’s exclusion and highlights the need for their inclusion in space exploration.

• It creates a sense of redundancy, making the argument sound less impactful.

• It minimizes the importance of public involvement in space exploration.

How does Jemison’s use of the word "inclusive" contribute to the tone of the passage?

• It creates a tone of exclusivity, focusing on the limitations of space exploration.

• It establishes a tone of openness, suggesting that space exploration should be a collective effort.

• It makes the argument sound indifferent to the need for public support.

• It suggests that only experts should participate in space exploration.

Tags

CCSS.RL.4.4

CCSS.RL.5.4

CCSS.RL.6.4

CCSS.RL.7.4

CCSS.RL.8.4

How does Jemison use the comparison between Proxima Centauri and New York City to convey the challenges of space exploration?

• By comparing the vastness of space to something familiar, she emphasizes the enormity of the task ahead.

• She downplays the challenges of space exploration, making it seem achievable.

• She focuses more on the technological aspects of space travel than the challenges.

• She suggests that space exploration is easier than expected.

Tags

CCSS.L.1.6

CCSS.L.3.6

CCSS.L.K.5A