AP Gov Required SCOTUS Cases

AP Gov Required SCOTUS Cases

10th - 12th Grade

14 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Chapter 8 Test (Government)

Chapter 8 Test (Government)

10th - 12th Grade

19 Qs

The Civil Rights Movement - Exit Quiz

The Civil Rights Movement - Exit Quiz

9th - 12th Grade

15 Qs

AP Gov Required SCOTUS Cases

AP Gov Required SCOTUS Cases

10th - 12th Grade

15 Qs

AP Gov SCOTUS cases

AP Gov SCOTUS cases

12th Grade - University

15 Qs

Civil Liberties Review

Civil Liberties Review

12th Grade

15 Qs

LIttle Rock Nine

LIttle Rock Nine

3rd Grade - University

10 Qs

Judicial Branch

Judicial Branch

9th - 12th Grade

12 Qs

Powers of Congress

Powers of Congress

12th Grade

10 Qs

AP Gov Required SCOTUS Cases

AP Gov Required SCOTUS Cases

Assessment

Quiz

Social Studies

10th - 12th Grade

Easy

Created by

Quizizz Content

Used 17+ times

FREE Resource

14 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

In McCulloch v. Maryland , the Supreme Court established which of the following principles?

States cannot interfere with or tax the legitimate activities of the federal government.

States have the right to tax federal institutions.

The federal government can only operate within its enumerated powers.

States can regulate interstate commerce.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

In Gideon v. Wainwright, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the

Sixth Amendment right-to-counsel provision applies to those accused of major crimes under state laws

Fifth Amendment protects against self-incrimination in state courts

Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal protection under the law

Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

In Engel v. Vitale (1962), which of the following provides the legal reasoning behind the Supreme Court’s ruling?

It ruled that the state had an overarching right to compel students to listen to a nondenominational prayer led by public school teachers, finding such action permissible under the Tenth Amendment.

It ruled that the state had no justifiable interest to compel students to listen to a nondenominational prayer led by public school teachers, finding a clear establishment clause violation.

It balanced the school’s interest in providing for an open and peaceful frame of mind for the school day with the interest of the students in not being subjected to the prayer, ultimately ruling for the state.

It rejected the student complaint, as public school students have no free exercise rights in school.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In response to the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain-Feingold Act), the United States Supreme Court, in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010), ruled that:

independent campaign expenditures by corporations and unions are protected by the First Amendment

corporate contributions to political campaigns are strictly prohibited

unions cannot engage in political advertising

the government can limit campaign spending by individuals

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

The decision in US v Lopez (1995) reflected new ideas about federalism at the time that can best be described as...?

A broadening of the authority of the commerce clause to include non-economic activities.

A narrowing of the authority of the commerce clause to only cases that involved economic activities.

An expansion of state powers over federal powers in all cases.

A complete rejection of federal authority in favor of state sovereignty.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

In the case Boynton v. Virginia (1960), the Supreme Court ruled that segregation at a bus stop restaurant was illegal based on the Interstate Commerce Act. How is this case similar to Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954)?

Both cases upheld segregation laws.

Both cases struck down local ordinances that prescribed segregation.

Both cases were decided by a 5-4 vote.

Both cases involved the rights of private businesses.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which of the following cases decided whether a state could compel children to attend school beyond eighth grade even if it violated the students’ sincerely held religious beliefs?

United States v. Lopez (1995)

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954)

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969)

Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?