Evaluating ECR Responses and Techniques

In this video, Angela from Custom Classroom by Angela explains the differences between a two-point and a five-point ECR student response. She uses a checklist to analyze sixth-grade student samples, focusing on key elements that contribute to higher scores. The video includes a detailed analysis of both a two-point and a five-point response, highlighting the importance of organization, development, and conventions. Angela also provides a free checklist and invites viewers to join her community for more resources.

What is the main focus of the video?

• Exploring different teaching methods

• Reviewing a math curriculum

• Analyzing ECR student responses

• Discussing classroom management

Who is the creator behind the video?

• Angela

• John

• Michael

• Sarah

What is the purpose of the checklist mentioned in the video?

• To organize classroom activities

• To analyze student responses

• To evaluate teacher performance

• To plan a lesson

What is the ECR prompt about?

• The impact of technology on education

• The effects of the camel mobile library

• The importance of school attendance

• The benefits of reading

What did the two-point response fail to do effectively?

• Develop and explain the evidence

• Answer the question

• Include any evidence

• Use proper grammar

What was one positive aspect of the two-point response?

• It had no spelling errors

• It was well-organized

• It had a strong conclusion

• It included evidence

What was a major issue with the conventions in the two-point response?

• It had many punctuation errors

• It was too long

• It used complex vocabulary

• It lacked a thesis statement

What did the five-point response include that the two-point response did not?

• A list of books

• A detailed explanation

• A quote from a teacher

• A personal story

How did the five-point response handle text evidence?

• It paraphrased and explained it

• It used it incorrectly

• It ignored it

• It only quoted it

What was a strength of the five-point response in terms of conventions?

• It used advanced vocabulary

• It had no errors

• It was very brief

• It was easy to follow