Questionário CPC

To decide the outcome of the case

To ensure the choice is not abusive

To appoint a new judge

To dismiss the case

They must be decided by a jury

They are processed within the limits of the judge's competence

They require a public trial

They must be resolved through arbitration

Processing and Decision

Arbitration and Mediation

Execution and Enforcement

Litigation and Settlement

The possibility of cases being processed by one judge and decided by another

The number of judges required for a decision

The time taken for a decision

The complexity of legal procedures

Fixation of competence and limitations for changes in the process

Increase in the number of judges required

Simplification of legal procedures

Elimination of arbitration

The occurrence of subsequent facts

The identification of a single competent judge

The application of the principle of typicity

The determination of jurisdiction

Territorial, functional, and objective

Subjective, territorial, and procedural

Objective, territorial, and functional

Procedural, subjective, and functional

There is a hierarchy among normative sources

There is no order of prevalence among normative sources

Normative sources are determined by federal law

Normative sources are irrelevant to jurisdiction

It establishes a strict order of prevalence.

It lists normative sources of competence without establishing an order of prevalence.

It abolishes all previous orders of prevalence.

It mandates a new order of prevalence.

When the case involves international parties.

When the case involves the Union, public companies, or certain entities.

When the case is related to family law.

When the case is about traffic violations.