LAW COMP 2 - OLA 1957

LAW COMP 2 - OLA 1957

11th Grade

11 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Section Views

Section Views

10th - 12th Grade

14 Qs

Cloud Computing

Cloud Computing

11th Grade

9 Qs

Tourism & Travel Fun Facts!

Tourism & Travel Fun Facts!

5th Grade - Professional Development

10 Qs

BPS Ethical Guidelines

BPS Ethical Guidelines

11th Grade

14 Qs

Lawful visitors - occupiers liability

Lawful visitors - occupiers liability

11th Grade - University

12 Qs

Unlawful visitors - occupiers liability

Unlawful visitors - occupiers liability

11th Grade - University

7 Qs

Reasoning

Reasoning

KG - University

14 Qs

VII Rules of Formal Logic

VII Rules of Formal Logic

9th Grade - Professional Development

14 Qs

LAW COMP 2 - OLA 1957

LAW COMP 2 - OLA 1957

Assessment

Quiz

Other

11th Grade

Easy

Created by

S V

Used 1+ times

FREE Resource

11 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who does the OLA 1957 apply to?

Visitors

Trespassers

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is an occupier, as in Wheat v Laicon?

An occupier is a visitor to the premises.
An occupier is a legal representative of the owner.
An occupier is someone who rents a property.
An occupier is a person who has control over the premises.

3.

MULTIPLE SELECT QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

Which of these are visitors?

Implied

Familiy

Expressed

Right by law (paramedic)

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Under what section does it say the occupier owes a duty to all lawful visitors?

s.2(3)

s.1(1)

s.2(2)

s.2(1)

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Under what section does it say the premises must be kept reasonably safe for adults?

s.2(3)

s.2(1)

s.2(2)

s.2(4)

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What section did it say that for children aged 7 and above, allurements must be removed?

s.2(3)(a)

s.2(3)

s.2(2)

s1.3

Answer explanation

An allurement is something attractive but dangerous

Glasgow V Taylor - Allurements weren't removed

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What case said that for very young children (5 and below) it's the parents responsibility?

Rae v Mars

Fitz v Rochester

Page v Smith

Roles v Nathan

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?