What is the main argument in Text 1? What examples does it use to support this view?

• What is the main argument in Text 2? What evidence does it use to show zoos are harmful?

• What is the main idea in Text 3? How does it differ from the first two texts?

• What language in Text 1 makes zoos sound positive and important?

1. What language in Text 2 makes zoos sound negative and harmful?

How do Text 1 and Text 2 disagree about whether zoos protect or harm animals?

How does Text 3 act as a middle ground between the two opposing views? Give an example.

Which text uses the strongest evidence, in your opinion? Why?

Which text do you think is most persuasive overall? Explain your answer with examples.

After reading all three texts, what is your own opinion about zoos? Use at least two pieces of evidence from the texts to support your view.