Exploring the Engel v. Vitale Supreme Court Case

Exploring the Engel v. Vitale Supreme Court Case

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

8th Grade

Hard

Created by

Sophia Harris

Used 1+ times

FREE Resource

The video discusses the landmark Supreme Court case Engel v. Vitale, which addressed the constitutionality of a non-denominational school prayer in New York. The case highlighted ongoing debates about the relationship between government and religion in the U.S. The Supreme Court ruled the prayer unconstitutional, citing the First Amendment's establishment clause. This decision significantly influenced future rulings on religious activities in public schools, shaping the interpretation of religious liberty in America.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What year did the New York Board of Regents introduce a non-denominational and voluntary prayer to be recited in schools?

1951

1945

1971

1962

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main reason behind the New York Board of Regents' decision to introduce a school prayer?

To improve academic performance

To promote religious practices

To instill greater morality and virtue in students

To comply with federal regulations

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which Supreme Court case ruled the New York school prayer unconstitutional?

Marbury v. Madison

Engel v. Vitale

Brown v. Board of Education

Roe v. Wade

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main argument of the plaintiffs in Engel v. Vitale?

The prayer violated the Free Exercise Clause

The prayer was compulsory

The prayer violated the Establishment Clause

The prayer promoted a specific religion

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did the Supreme Court rule in Engel v. Vitale?

4-3 in favor of the school prayer

6-1 against the school prayer

Unanimously against the school prayer

5-4 in favor of the school prayer

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who wrote the majority opinion in Engel v. Vitale?

Justice John Marshall

Justice Potter Stewart

Justice Hugo Black

Justice William Douglas

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did Justice Potter Stewart argue in his dissenting opinion in Engel v. Vitale?

The prayer was unconstitutional

The prayer established an official religion

The prayer was compulsory

A non-denominational prayer did not establish an official religion

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?