Voting Rights Act and Supreme Court Decisions

Voting Rights Act and Supreme Court Decisions

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, History

10th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Amelia Wright

FREE Resource

The video discusses the Voting Rights Act of 1965, aimed at eliminating racial discrimination in voting. It covers the Shelby County v. Holder case, where Shelby County challenged the constitutionality of Sections 4 and 5 of the Act. The Supreme Court struck down Section 4, weakening Section 5, citing outdated criteria. Justice Ginsburg dissented, highlighting ongoing voter suppression issues. The decision led to states enacting restrictive voting laws. The video concludes with a call to update the Voting Rights Act to address current challenges.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the primary purpose of the Voting Rights Act of 1965?

To increase voter turnout

To stop racially discriminatory practices in voting

To create new voting districts

To limit the power of the federal government

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which sections of the Voting Rights Act were challenged by Shelby County?

Sections 4b and 5

Sections 3 and 4

Sections 6 and 7

Sections 1 and 2

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who wrote the majority opinion in the Supreme Court decision for Shelby County v. Holder?

Chief Justice John Roberts

Justice Clarence Thomas

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Justice Sonia Sotomayor

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main argument of the majority opinion regarding Section 4b of the Voting Rights Act?

It was irrelevant

It was too strict

It was outdated

It was too lenient

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which Justice wrote a dissenting opinion in the Shelby County v. Holder case?

Justice Clarence Thomas

Justice Samuel Alito

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Justice Stephen Breyer

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did Justice Ginsburg argue about the necessity of the Voting Rights Act?

It should be limited to certain states

It should be expanded

It was still necessary due to ongoing discrimination

It was no longer needed

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What immediate action did some states take following the Supreme Court's decision?

Reduced voter registration requirements

Increased voter protections

Implemented new voter ID laws

Expanded voting rights

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?