The video discusses the landmark case Baker v. Carr, which addressed the issue of reapportionment in Tennessee. The Supreme Court ruled that apportionment and redistricting challenges are justiciable, allowing federal courts to intervene in such cases. This decision marked a significant shift from previous rulings that considered these issues political and non-justiciable. The case established the principle of 'one-person, one-vote,' ensuring equal voting power across districts. The video also highlights the dissenting and majority opinions and the case's lasting impact on voting rights.

What was the main issue in the Baker v. Carr case?

• The legality of voting machines

• The right to free speech

• Reapportionment and redistricting in Tennessee

• The use of electronic ballots

What was the population issue in Tennessee that led to Baker v. Carr?

• All districts were underpopulated

• There was no population issue

• Some districts were ten times larger than others

• All districts had equal populations

What did the Supreme Court decide regarding the justiciability of apportionment and redistricting?

• They are not constitutional issues

• They are purely political issues

• They are justiciable and raise constitutional issues

• They should be decided by the President

What was the Supreme Court's stance on apportionment issues before Baker v. Carr?

• They were ignored by the courts

• They were always ruled on by the courts

• They were seen as political issues

• They were considered justiciable

What was the dissenting opinion's view on the court's involvement in political issues?

• The court should be involved in all political issues

• The court should remain detached from political entanglements

• The court should only involve itself in economic issues

• The court should decide all political questions

According to the majority opinion, why can courts rule on apportionment and redistricting issues?

• They are not important

• They are voting rights issues, which are constitutional

• They are purely political issues

• They are economic issues

What constitutional principle was highlighted in Baker v. Carr?

• The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

• The Tenth Amendment

• The First Amendment

• The Second Amendment

What principle did Baker v. Carr help establish in future voting rights cases?

• One-person, one-vote

• One-state, one-vote

• One-candidate, one-vote

• One-party, one-vote

How did Baker v. Carr impact the drawing of legislative districts?

• It had no impact on district drawing

• It required districts to be drawn by the President

• It banned malapportionment

• It allowed for districts of unequal size

What was the effect of Baker v. Carr on minority rights?

• It diminished minority rights

• It protected minority rights

• It only affected majority rights

• It had no effect on minority rights