Cheerleading Case Ruling Analysis

Cheerleading Case Ruling Analysis

Assessment

Interactive Video

Journalism, Physical Ed, Performing Arts

6th - 10th Grade

Hard

Created by

Sophia Harris

FREE Resource

The Junior Varsity Cheerleaders file a complaint against Owen Scott, the school newspaper editor, for not considering cheerleading a sport in the sports section. The editor defends his article by stating factual reasons for the exclusion. The discussion shifts to distinguishing facts from opinions, leading to a ruling in favor of the cheerleaders. The editor is sentenced to perform with the cheerleaders at a basketball game.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who filed the case against Owen Scott?

The school board

The basketball team

The Junior Varsity Cheerleaders

The school principal

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did the cheerleaders want the newspaper to do?

Write a correction stating cheerleading is a sport

Publish more articles about basketball

Interview the cheerleading coach

Feature them on the front page

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Owen Scott's main argument for not including cheerleading on the sports page?

There are no scores or standings for cheerleading

The cheerleaders did not request it

The sports page is full

Cheerleading is not popular

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the difference between a fact and an opinion according to the judge?

A fact is something that can be proven true, while an opinion cannot

A fact is more interesting than an opinion

An opinion is always false

A fact is always written in newspapers

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did the judge rule regarding the cheerleaders' complaint?

To hold another hearing

To dismiss the case

In favor of the cheerleaders

In favor of Owen Scott

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the cheerleaders' reaction to the judge's ruling?

They were disappointed

They celebrated their victory

They were indifferent

They decided to appeal

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did the judge say about Owen Scott's article?

It was well-written

It was his business what he wrote

It was factually incorrect

It was the best article of the year

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?