Understanding Theft Under the Theft Act 1968

Understanding Theft Under the Theft Act 1968

Assessment

Interactive Video

Law, Social Studies

10th Grade - University

Hard

Created by

Jackson Turner

FREE Resource

This video tutorial provides an in-depth analysis of the offence of theft as defined by the Theft Act 1968. It breaks down the statutory definition into its core elements: actus reus and mens rea. The tutorial explores the concepts of appropriation, property, and belonging to another, supported by case law examples. It also delves into the mens rea elements of dishonesty and intention to permanently deprive, explaining the legal tests and exceptions. The video aims to clarify the complexities of theft law, despite its intended simplification by the Theft Act.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the maximum penalty for theft under the Theft Act 1968?

10 years

7 years

5 years

12 years

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which of the following is NOT an element of Actus Reus in theft?

Belonging to another

Property

Dishonesty

Appropriation

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In the case of Morris, what action was considered an appropriation?

Accepting a gift

Selling an item

Switching labels on items

Tugging a handbag

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to the Theft Act, which of the following is considered property?

A dead body

Confidential information

Wild mushrooms

A pet

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In the case of Kelly and Lindsay, why were body parts considered property?

They were part of a criminal investigation

They were stolen from a museum

They were preserved and dissected

They were used for medical research

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does Section 5.3 of the Theft Act state about property given with instructions?

It cannot be stolen

It remains the property of the giver

It is considered abandoned

It becomes the property of the receiver

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which case illustrates that a person can be guilty of stealing their own property?

Woodman

Oxford and Moss

Turner

Davidge and Benet

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?