Understanding American Nuclear Strategy

Understanding American Nuclear Strategy

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, History, Philosophy

11th Grade - University

Hard

Created by

Mia Campbell

FREE Resource

The video discusses the American grand strategy regarding nuclear weapons, emphasizing that only friendly nations should possess them. It explores the concept of preventive war, particularly in relation to Iran and North Korea, and the challenges of disarming nuclear states. The speaker highlights the importance of deterrence and the risks posed by nuclear weapons falling into the hands of non-state actors. The critique focuses on the need for better nuclear proliferation policies, ensuring that nuclear weapons remain under state control and are not lost or stolen.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the core principle of the American grand strategy regarding nuclear weapons?

Only allied countries should possess nuclear weapons.

Nuclear weapons should be used for economic growth.

Nuclear weapons should be possessed by all countries.

Nuclear weapons should be banned globally.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the American stance on countries they do not favor acquiring nuclear weapons?

They actively prevent it.

They provide financial aid.

They remain neutral.

They support their nuclear development.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a preventive war as discussed in the context of nuclear proliferation?

A war declared after being attacked.

A war to expand territorial boundaries.

A war initiated to prevent an imminent attack.

A war fought to prevent future threats.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a significant challenge in preventing nuclear proliferation?

Lack of technological knowledge.

The need for military superiority.

Global support for nuclear weapons.

Insufficient economic resources.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is there a need for an honest debate on nuclear proliferation?

To understand the consequences of preventive wars.

To reduce military spending.

To increase the number of nuclear states.

To promote nuclear energy.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the potential risk of not having an honest debate on nuclear proliferation?

Increased global peace.

Unintended consequences of wars.

Reduction in nuclear weapons.

Improved international relations.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the United States ensure deterrence against nuclear-armed states?

By reducing its nuclear arsenal.

By having a large and modernized nuclear force.

By forming alliances with non-nuclear states.

By maintaining a secretive nuclear policy.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?