Understanding Philosophical Methodologies and Reductio ad Absurdum

Understanding Philosophical Methodologies and Reductio ad Absurdum

Assessment

Interactive Video

Philosophy, Physics

10th Grade - University

Hard

Created by

Emma Peterson

FREE Resource

The video discusses the unreflective nature of philosophers regarding their methodologies and introduces the concept of reductio ad absurdum, a common argumentative tool. It explains how this method is used to deduce contradictions from opponents' premises, using Galileo's argument about falling objects as a classic example.

Read more

9 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one reason the author wrote the book?

To criticize philosophers for being too reflective

To highlight the unreflective nature of philosophers about their methods

To introduce new philosophical tools

To discuss the history of philosophy

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is reductio ad absurdum?

A method to prove something by direct evidence

A way to deduce contradictions from premises

A tool to avoid philosophical arguments

A method to support an argument with examples

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How is reductio ad absurdum used in everyday language?

By avoiding contradictions

By providing direct evidence for a claim

By supporting arguments with facts

By pointing out absurd consequences of a statement

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Galileo trying to disprove with his argument?

That light things fall faster than heavy things

That all objects fall at the same speed

That heavy things fall faster than light things

That friction affects the speed of falling objects

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In Galileo's argument, what happens when stone A is tied to stone B?

A and B do not fall

A and B fall slower than A alone

A and B fall faster than A alone

A and B fall at the same speed

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What contradiction arises in Galileo's argument?

A and B should fall at the same speed

A and B should fall both faster and slower than A alone

A and B should not fall at all

A and B should fall at different speeds

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the significance of reductio ad absurdum in philosophy?

It is a minor tool in philosophical discussions

It is rarely used in philosophical arguments

It is a fundamental tool in philosophical argumentation

It is only used in scientific arguments

8.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How long has reductio ad absurdum been known?

For several millennia

For several centuries

Since the 20th century

For a few decades

9.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main purpose of using reductio ad absurdum?

To support a hypothesis with evidence

To prove a premise is true

To avoid philosophical debates

To show a premise leads to a contradiction