NASA and SpaceX: Risk Management and Historical Context

NASA and SpaceX: Risk Management and Historical Context

Assessment

Interactive Video

Science, History, Business

9th - 12th Grade

Medium

Created by

Jackson Turner

Used 1+ times

FREE Resource

The video discusses NASA's historical risk aversion due to past tragedies like the Challenger disaster. It explains NASA's shift from being a contractor to a client, transferring risk to private companies like SpaceX. This shift allows NASA to reduce its direct responsibility for space missions. The video also draws parallels between current space exploration and historical railroad expansion, highlighting the role of private companies in pioneering new frontiers.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one of the main criticisms directed at NASA?

They rely too heavily on international partnerships.

They take too many risks.

They focus too much on Mars.

They don't take enough risks.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which disaster is mentioned as a significant tragedy in NASA's history?

Columbia

Hubble

Apollo 13

Challenger

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How has NASA's role changed in recent years?

From a client to a contractor

From a space agency to a defense agency

From a research agency to a commercial entity

From a contractor to a client

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is SpaceX's relationship with NASA?

SpaceX is a competitor to NASA.

SpaceX sells NASA rides to the International Space Station.

SpaceX is a government agency.

SpaceX builds rockets for NASA.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main benefit for NASA in hiring private companies like SpaceX?

Increased control over missions

Shifted risk and responsibility

Reduced financial costs

Faster mission timelines

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a potential downside for NASA in hiring private companies?

Criticism for outsourcing

Increased risk of failure

Loss of public interest

Higher costs

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why are private companies considered better equipped to handle risks?

They have more government oversight.

They don't have to elect a CEO every four years.

They are not accountable to anyone.

They have unlimited budgets.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?