Understanding the Age of Obama

Understanding the Age of Obama

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, History, Philosophy

10th Grade - University

Hard

Created by

Emma Peterson

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses Barack Obama's media presence and leadership style, contrasting symbolic achievements with substantial progress. It highlights structural inequalities, such as wealth disparity and inadequate public services, and critiques Obama's approach to addressing these issues. The transition from the Reagan era to the Obama era is examined, emphasizing the need for hope and change in political discourse.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main criticism of Obama's approach to healthcare reform?

He focused too much on public opinion.

He lacked decisiveness and backbone.

He ignored the media's influence.

He was too aggressive in his policies.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the difference between symbolic and substantial progress as discussed in the video?

Symbolic progress is more important than substantial progress.

Substantial progress is about breaking glass ceilings.

Symbolic progress refers to visible achievements, while substantial progress addresses deeper structural issues.

Substantial progress is easier to achieve than symbolic progress.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What structural issues are highlighted despite opportunities at the top?

Increased political engagement.

Improved healthcare systems.

Better educational opportunities.

Wealth inequality and inadequate public services.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What marks the transition from the age of Reagan to the age of Obama?

A shift towards more conservative policies.

An end to the politics of fear and a call for fairness and compassion.

A decrease in media influence.

A focus on economic growth.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main critique of Obama's political approach in the final section?

He was too focused on international issues.

He ignored environmental concerns.

He was too aggressive in foreign policy.

He recycled Clinton-era policies without focusing on the poor and working class.