Blade Performance and Design Evaluation

The judges evaluate three blades crafted by Brian, Craig, and Paul. Brian's blade is durable but uncomfortable to handle. Craig's blade shows significant improvement with a better handle position, while Paul's blade offers excellent control and natural material appeal. The judges deliberate and make a final decision on the best blade.

What was the initial impression of Brian's blade?

• It had a perfect handle.

• It was very thick and durable.

• It was too light.

• It was too thin.

What was the main issue with Brian's blade?

• The blade was too sharp.

• The handle was uncomfortable.

• The blade was too short.

• The handle was too long.

What improvement did Craig make to his blade?

• He made the blade longer.

• He shortened and repositioned the handle.

• He changed the blade material.

• He added a decorative element.

How did Craig's blade perform compared to expectations?

• It performed worse than expected.

• It performed as expected.

• It performed better than expected.

• It did not perform at all.

What was notable about Paul's blade handle?

• It was too small.

• It was too thick.

• It matched the blade well and provided control.

• It was made of synthetic material.

How did the judges feel about the natural material of Paul's blade?

• They really liked it.

• They found it too heavy.

• They were indifferent.

• They disliked it.

Which blade did Doug feel most in control of?

• Brian's blade

• Craig's blade

• Paul's blade

• None of the blades

What was the final task for the judges?

• To test the blades again.

• To interview the blade makers.

• To make a final decision.

• To redesign the blades.

What was the judges' reaction after making their decision?

• They were confused.

• They were disappointed.

• They were unsure.

• They were confident.