Missouri Compromise and Its Implications

Missouri Compromise and Its Implications

Assessment

Interactive Video

History, Social Studies, Moral Science, Philosophy

9th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Emma Peterson

Used 4+ times

FREE Resource

The video discusses the Missouri Compromise of 1819, highlighting the debate between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions. It critiques the compromise as a flawed middle ground fallacy, arguing that compromising on moral issues like slavery is indefensible. The video concludes with the events leading to the Civil War, emphasizing that some issues cannot be resolved through compromise.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Representative James Tallmage Jr.'s stance on slavery in Missouri?

He supported slavery in Missouri.

He believed slavery was morally wrong and should not be allowed.

He thought it was a state's right to decide on slavery.

He was indifferent to the issue of slavery.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Representative Tyler's argument regarding slavery?

He supported the abolition of slavery.

He thought slavery should be banned in all states.

He argued it was a state's right to choose about slavery.

He believed the federal government should decide on slavery.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did Senator Thomas propose as a compromise?

Allowing slavery in all new states.

Prohibiting slavery in both Missouri and Maine.

Banning slavery in all new states.

Allowing Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main critique of the Missouri Compromise?

It was too lenient on slave states.

It did not address economic issues.

It favored the federal government too much.

It was based on the middle ground fallacy.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the middle ground fallacy as discussed in the critique?

Thinking that both sides of an argument are equally valid.

Believing that a compromise is always the best solution.

Assuming that one side is always right.

Ignoring the moral implications of a compromise.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did the founders of the country acknowledge about slavery?

It was a state's right.

It was economically beneficial.

It was morally indefensible.

It was a necessary evil.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What consequence does the critique highlight about compromising on morally indefensible positions?

It strengthens federal power.

It leads to economic instability.

It perpetuates injustices.

It resolves conflicts effectively.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?