Understanding Online Propaganda and Social Media Dynamics

Understanding Online Propaganda and Social Media Dynamics

Assessment

Interactive Video

Journalism, Social Studies, Moral Science

10th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Aiden Montgomery

FREE Resource

The speaker shares insights from three years of investigating online toxicity, focusing on the creators of harmful content and their methods. He highlights the role of emotion in driving social media engagement and the normalization of extremist ideas. The talk explores pathways to radicalization and offers strategies for reducing online toxicity, emphasizing the need for individuals and social media companies to take responsibility for shaping a healthier internet.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the primary goal of the speaker's investigation into online content creators?

To promote a political agenda

To create viral memes

To understand the impact of toxic content on society

To become a social media influencer

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How do social media propagandists typically spread their messages?

By using traditional media outlets

By exploiting emotional engagement on social media

By publishing academic papers

By organizing public rallies

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a common characteristic of individuals who become radicalized online?

High IQ and high EQ

High IQ and low EQ

Low IQ and high EQ

Low IQ and low EQ

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did the speaker find disappointing about his interactions with some extremists?

They were too friendly

They couldn't identify his Jewish background

They were uninterested in his work

They were too secretive

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the speaker's view on the inevitability of the internet's impact?

The internet will inevitably destroy us

The internet is irrelevant to societal progress

The internet will inevitably save us

The internet's impact is not inevitable

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the difference between smart skepticism and dumb skepticism?

Smart skepticism involves questioning claims with evidence, while dumb skepticism is contrarian without reason

Smart skepticism is always negative, while dumb skepticism is always positive

Smart skepticism is based on emotions, while dumb skepticism is based on facts

Smart skepticism is for experts, while dumb skepticism is for beginners

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the speaker suggest about free speech in the context of online platforms?

Free speech should be restricted to certain groups

Free speech is the beginning of a meaningful conversation

Free speech is the end of the conversation

Free speech should have no limits

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?