Design Microservices Architecture with Patterns and Principles - API Gateway Pattern

Design Microservices Architecture with Patterns and Principles - API Gateway Pattern

Assessment

Interactive Video

Information Technology (IT), Architecture

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video tutorial explains the API Gateway pattern, which serves as a single entry point for client applications, managing routing to internal microservices and handling cross-cutting concerns like authentication and rate limiting. It compares the API Gateway to the Facade pattern in Object-Oriented design, highlighting its role as a reverse proxy. The tutorial emphasizes the importance of avoiding a single point of failure by splitting the API Gateway into multiple services based on business boundaries. It concludes with a caution against using a single API Gateway for all microservices, recommending segregation to manage complexity effectively.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the primary role of an API Gateway in a microservices architecture?

To serve as a single entry point for client applications

To store data for microservices

To directly connect clients to each microservice

To replace the need for microservices

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which design pattern is the API Gateway pattern similar to?

Singleton pattern

Observer pattern

Facade pattern

Decorator pattern

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does an API Gateway handle requests from client applications?

By rejecting requests that are too complex

By directly executing the requests

By routing requests to the appropriate internal microservices

By storing requests for later processing

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a potential risk of using a single API Gateway?

Increased security

Single point of failure

Improved performance

Reduced complexity

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a recommended practice to avoid the risks associated with a single API Gateway?

Using a single, larger API Gateway

Splitting the API Gateway into multiple smaller services

Using a different design pattern

Eliminating the API Gateway entirely