The Legacy of Systemic Racism

The video explores the history and impact of racial zoning and restrictive covenants in the U.S., highlighting key legal cases and their implications. It also delves into the social roles of forms of address, examining how they influence interactions and perceptions.

What was discovered about Chief Justice Rehnquist's properties during his nomination?

• They were free of any covenants.

• They had racial covenants restricting ownership.

• They were located in multiple countries.

• They were all commercial properties.

Which city was the first to implement racial zoning in the US?

• Chicago

• Baltimore

• Los Angeles

• New York

What did the Supreme Court rule in Shelley v. Kramer?

• Property ownership was not subject to any restrictions.

• Racial covenants were enforceable.

• Private agreements could not be enforced by courts.

• Racial zoning was constitutional.

Why were title companies hesitant to stop reporting racial covenants?

• They were unaware of the legal changes.

• They wanted to promote racial equality.

• They feared potential liability.

• They believed they were still enforceable.

What was the impact of racial covenants on property values?

• They increased property values.

• They had no impact on property values.

• They could lead to decreased property values due to white flight.

• They stabilized property values.

What role did the Department of Justice play in addressing racial covenants?

• They supported the continuation of racial covenants.

• They enforced racial covenants.

• They ignored the issue.

• They sent cease and desist letters to title companies.

How do forms of address differ from property titles?

• They are fluid and adaptable.

• They are more rigid and unchangeable.

• They have no social impact.

• They are legally binding.

What does the 'first law of address' suggest about social interactions?

• They are irrelevant to social dynamics.

• They are legally binding.

• They are self-enforcing through social norms.

• They require external enforcement.

What is the significance of the term 'boy' in historical context?

• It was a term of endearment.

• It was used to refer to young males.

• It was a reference to slaves.

• It was a legal term for property owners.

How did the use of the term 'boy' change after the Civil War?

• It became a term for young males.

• It was no longer used.

• It became a reference for slaves.

• It was used to refer to women.