Schechter Poultry vs US (1935): US History Review

The video discusses the Chester vs. United States case, highlighting its significance in the context of FDR's New Deal and federalism. It explains the National Industrial Recovery Act and Chester Poultry Corporation's violations. The Supreme Court's decision emphasized state power and separation of powers, striking down parts of the New Deal. FDR's reaction included a controversial court-packing plan, which faced public opposition.

What was the main purpose of the National Industrial Recovery Act as discussed in the video?

• To ban the sale of poultry across state lines

• To provide subsidies to poultry farmers

• To increase taxes on poultry products

• To promote fair competition through codes written by trade groups

What humorous rule was mentioned in the court case regarding the selection of chickens?

• Chickens had to be weighed before selection

• Customers had to pick the first chicken that touched their hand

• Only white chickens could be selected

• Chickens had to be selected by a judge

What was the Supreme Court's stance on the delegation of power from Congress to the President?

• It was a temporary measure

• It was necessary for economic recovery

• It was supported by the 10th Amendment

• It was a violation of the separation of powers

How did the Supreme Court view the application of the Interstate Commerce Clause in this case?

• It was overextended to cover intrastate activities

• It was correctly applied to regulate poultry sales

• It supported federal regulation of all commerce

• It was irrelevant to the case

What was FDR's proposed solution to the Supreme Court's decision against his New Deal programs?

• Abolishing the Supreme Court

• Appealing the decision to a higher court

• Increasing the number of Supreme Court justices

• Implementing new economic policies