Descriptions vs. Explanations

The transcript discusses the potential for clear laws in human sciences akin to natural sciences, while cautioning against the pitfalls of relativism. It differentiates between descriptive and explanatory abstract concepts, emphasizing the need for careful application in explanations. The discussion extends to the role of social science models in policymaking, advocating for their use as rough generalizations rather than absolute truths.

What is a potential risk of focusing too much on individual narratives in human sciences?

• It ensures accurate predictions.

• It could result in extreme relativism.

• It simplifies complex behaviors.

• It may lead to universal truths.

What is the key distinction between abstract concepts discussed in the second section?

• Predictive and theoretical

• Explanatory and predictive

• Descriptive and explanatory

• Descriptive and predictive

Why is it important to be cautious when using abstract concepts for explanatory work?

• They are universally applicable.

• They need to be unpacked in terms of intentionality.

• They can be easily misunderstood.

• They are always accurate.

What is a criticism of social science models in terms of policy-making?

• They are universally applicable.

• They are always accurate.

• They are too complex.

• They lack policy relevance.

How should policymakers view social science models according to the third section?

• As universally applicable

• As scientific truths

• As irrelevant

• As rough and ready generalizations