Rational Basis Review - Minimum Rationality

The video tutorial explains the rational basis or minimum rationality standard of constitutional review. It highlights that the government must justify any law it passes, especially if it affects individual rights. If a law does not impact a fundamental right, a lower standard of review, known as the rational basis standard, is applied. This standard checks if there is a legitimate reason and rational connection between the law and the government's goals. If a law is arbitrary with no legitimate reasoning, it is likely unconstitutional.

What is the primary requirement for a law under the rational basis review?

• It must be approved by a majority vote.

• It must not affect any individual rights.

• It must have a legitimate government interest.

• It must be the most effective way to achieve its goal.

When does a higher standard of review apply to a law?

• When the law is passed by a local government.

• When the law is economically significant.

• When the law is temporary.

• When the law affects a fundamental right.

What does the court look for when applying the rational basis standard?

• A minimal impact on the economy.

• A unanimous agreement among lawmakers.

• A rational connection between the law and its purpose.

• A direct benefit to the government.

What happens if a law is found to be arbitrary under the rational basis review?

• It is sent back to the legislature for revision.

• It is considered unconstitutional.

• It is enforced with conditions.

• It is automatically amended.

Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of a law that passes the rational basis review?

• It has a legitimate government interest.

• It is arbitrary and lacks reasoning.

• It has a rational connection to its goal.

• It is justified in its impact on society.