Appeals Court Tosses Out Climate Case Brought By 21 Young Plaintiffs

In a lawsuit filed by 21 young individuals, the government is accused of neglecting climate change, infringing on constitutional rights. Initially filed in 2015, the case was deemed compelling by a 9th Circuit Court panel but was ruled to be addressed by political branches or voters. A dissenting judge likened the situation to an asteroid threat, criticizing the government's stance. The supporting legal organization plans to seek a full court review.

Who filed the lawsuit against the government regarding climate change?

• A coalition of states

• Environmental organizations

• 21 children and young adults

• A group of scientists

What constitutional rights do the plaintiffs claim are being violated by the government's actions on climate change?

• Freedom of speech and religion

• Right to bear arms

• Life, liberty, and property

• Right to privacy

What was the decision of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the climate change lawsuit?

• The case was sent to the Supreme Court

• The issue should be addressed by political branches or voters

• The government was ordered to take immediate action

• The case was dismissed outright

What analogy did the dissenting judge use to describe the government's inaction on climate change?

• A flood without a dam

• A forest fire left unchecked

• An asteroid barreling toward Earth

• A ship sinking without lifeboats

What is the next step planned by the legal organization supporting the young plaintiffs?

• File a new lawsuit

• Appeal to the Supreme Court

• Request a review from the full 9th Circuit Court

• Organize a public protest