PM says ending conversion therapy is ‘complex’, but ministers will ‘stamp it out’

The speaker addresses the psychological harm and legal implications of a certain practice, labeling it as repulsive and abhorrent. They express regret over the departure of advisors but emphasize their commitment to resolving the issue, despite its complexity. The speaker reiterates their stance against the practice, emphasizing its incompatibility with modern values and their determination to eliminate it.

What is the speaker's opinion on the practice discussed in the first section?

• The speaker finds it repulsive and abhorrent.

• The speaker finds it acceptable.

• The speaker supports it.

• The speaker is indifferent.

What challenge does the speaker mention about addressing the issue?

• It is legally prohibited.

• It is technically complex.

• It is widely accepted.

• It is financially burdensome.

What is the speaker's stance on taking further steps regarding the issue?

• The speaker is hesitant.

• The speaker is determined.

• The speaker is unsure.

• The speaker is opposed.

In the context of LGBT issues, how does the speaker view the practice?

• As having no place in the 21st century.

• As a minor concern.

• As a beneficial practice.

• As a necessary tradition.

What is the speaker's ultimate goal regarding the practice?

• To ignore it.

• To promote it.

• To study it further.

• To stamp it out.