Is Measure for Measure a Comedy | Genre in Shakespeare | Shakespeare Play by Play Season 1

The video explores Shakespeare's 'Measure for Measure', questioning its classification as a comedy due to its complex and unhappy marriages. It examines the Duke's role as a playwright and moral instructor, critiquing the comedic form and its societal implications. The character of Isabella is analyzed, highlighting her struggles with societal norms and patriarchal power.

Why is 'Measure for Measure' initially classified as a comedy?

• It ends with multiple marriages.

• It was never performed on stage.

• It was written in the 18th century.

• It has a tragic ending.

What is the main issue with Angelo and Mariana's marriage?

• They have a strong foundation of trust.

• Angelo abandoned Mariana after she lost her dowry.

• They are deeply in love.

• Mariana is not interested in marriage.

How does the play critique strict legalism?

• By showing that all marriages are happy.

• By promoting strict adherence to the law.

• By ignoring the laws completely.

• By applying the same legal standards to different situations.

What role does the Duke assume in the play?

• A playwright orchestrating events.

• A rebellious character.

• A silent character.

• A passive observer.

What is the Duke's intention with the play he orchestrates?

• To entertain without any message.

• To restore social order and provide moral instruction.

• To create chaos.

• To criticize the audience.

How does the Duke expose Angelo's flaws?

• By giving him power and observing his actions.

• By ignoring his actions.

• By praising him constantly.

• By supporting all his decisions.

What is the critique of the comedic form in the play?

• It is too entertaining.

• It fails to provide moral instruction.

• It is too short.

• It is too complex.

What societal expectations does Isabella struggle with?

• Becoming a soldier.

• Becoming a playwright.

• Becoming a queen.

• Becoming a nun or marrying.

How is the Duke portrayed in terms of morality?

• As a perfect moral guide.

• As deeply problematic and human.

• As a villain.

• As a silent observer.

What is the play's stance on happy endings?

• They are easily achievable.

• They are guaranteed.

• They are questioned and critiqued.

• They are impossible.