Greater Idaho: Why Idaho Wants To Take Over Oregon And Eventually Washington and California Too

The video explores the Greater Idaho movement, where Idaho aims to expand its borders into parts of Oregon, Washington, and California. It delves into the historical context of the Oregon Territory and the political divergence between Oregon and Idaho over the years. The movement is driven by political and cultural differences, with Eastern Oregon counties seeking to join Idaho due to its conservative stance. The video discusses the potential implications of such a move, including political gerrymandering and increased polarization, while highlighting the low likelihood of the expansion occurring due to legal and political hurdles.

What was the original territory that included both Oregon and Idaho?

• The Washington Territory

• The Montana Territory

• The Oregon Territory

• The Idaho Territory

Which political shift occurred in Oregon and Idaho starting in 1988?

• Both states became more liberal

• Oregon leaned left while Idaho leaned right

• Idaho leaned left while Oregon leaned right

• Both states became more conservative

What is the main reason behind the Greater Idaho movement?

• Economic benefits from tourism

• Cultural alignment with Idaho's conservative values

• Access to better education systems

• Improved healthcare facilities

Which areas are excluded from the Greater Idaho movement's plans?

• Portland and Eugene

• Bend and The Dalles

• Boise and Nampa

• Salem and Corvallis

What is a significant environmental concern related to the Greater Idaho movement?

• Deforestation in the Cascade Mountains

• Air pollution in urban areas

• Mining opportunities in Eastern Oregon

• Water scarcity in Western Oregon

Why is the likelihood of the Greater Idaho movement's success considered low?

• Lack of public interest

• Opposition from Idaho politicians

• Complex legal and political processes

• Insufficient financial resources

What potential national impact could the Greater Idaho movement have?

• Increase in Democratic representation

• Decrease in political polarization

• Improved relations between states

• Setting a precedent for state boundary changes