Michelle O'Neill and Conor Murphy comment on Protocol talks

The transcript discusses the engagement with businesses across sectors and their desire for a quick resolution to the protocol. It emphasizes the need for a locally functional executive to counter austerity and improve public services. The speaker urges both the British Government and the EU to finalize negotiations swiftly, highlighting the importance of maintaining the protocol's protections. The role of the CJ is mentioned as a potential issue, and the speaker concludes by encouraging a resolution to restore the local executive and deliver better public services.

What is the main reason the speaker wants a quick resolution to the protocol issue?

• To improve international relations

• To enhance public transportation

• To restore the local executive and counteract austerity

• To increase business profits

What is the speaker's stance on the Protocol and its protections?

• They should be expanded to other regions

• They should be ignored

• They should be maintained and improved where necessary

• They should be completely removed

Who are the two main negotiating partners in the protocol discussions?

• The US and the UN

• The EU and the UN

• The British Government and the EU

• The British Government and the US

What is the speaker's view on the role of the CJ in the negotiations?

• It is a major stumbling block

• It is irrelevant to the negotiations

• It is a minor issue that can be ignored

• It is a new and significant factor

What does the speaker hope to achieve by encouraging a quick resolution?

• To delay the negotiations further

• To restore the local executive and deliver public services

• To reduce public spending

• To increase taxes