Supreme Court's Prorogation Ruling Explained (Podcast) - Brexit Explained

The video discusses the UK Supreme Court's unanimous ruling that Boris Johnson's prorogation of Parliament was unlawful. The ruling allows Parliament to resume, with no Prime Minister's Questions scheduled. Political leaders, including Jo Swinson and Jeremy Corbyn, have called for Johnson's resignation. The video also explores the potential for future prorogation and its implications.

What was the Supreme Court's decision regarding Boris Johnson's prorogation of Parliament?

• It was unlawful but justified.

• It was lawful but unjustified.

• It was unlawful and unjustified.

• It was lawful and justified.

Why did all 11 Supreme Court justices sit for the ruling on prorogation?

• To prevent claims of bias based on the composition of the panel.

• To expedite the decision-making process.

• To ensure a unanimous decision.

• To follow a new legal protocol.

What was the immediate consequence of the Supreme Court's ruling?

• A new election was called.

• Parliament was allowed to reconvene.

• The Prime Minister resigned.

• Parliament was dissolved.

What was the reaction of political leaders to the Supreme Court's ruling?

• They called for Boris Johnson's resignation.

• They ignored the ruling.

• They demanded a new election.

• They unanimously supported Boris Johnson.

Who was also called to resign alongside Boris Johnson?

• John Bercow

• Jeremy Corbyn

• Dominic Cummings

• Nigel Farage

What did Boris Johnson refuse to rule out after the Supreme Court's decision?

• Changing his political party.

• Resigning from his position.

• Proroguing Parliament again.

• Calling a new election.

What would be the legal basis for a future prorogation by Boris Johnson?

• To prevent debate on Brexit.

• To set out a domestic agenda.

• To dissolve Parliament permanently.

• To call for a new election.