Videotaped interrogations - A matter of perspective

The video discusses how facial expressions and camera angles can influence perceptions of trustworthiness and confessions. It highlights the role of camera angle bias in leading to false confessions and wrongful convictions, as evidenced by the Innocence Project's work. The video suggests that using a camera angle that includes both the interrogator and the suspect can reduce bias and improve judgment accuracy.

What factors are mentioned as contributing to a face appearing trustworthy?

• A smile and non-threatening demeanor

• A serious expression and direct eye contact

• A neutral expression and looking away

• A frown and avoiding eye contact

How does camera angle bias affect perceptions in tape confessions?

• It makes the suspect appear more innocent

• It always leads to a conviction

• It has no effect on perceptions

• It can influence perceptions of guilt or innocence

What is the effect of focusing the camera on the suspect during a confession?

• It makes the suspect appear more innocent

• It has no impact on the judgment

• It increases the likelihood of a conviction

• It makes the confession seem less voluntary

What is suggested as a way to reduce bias in camera angles during interrogations?

• Focusing solely on the interrogator

• Focusing solely on the suspect

• Showing both the interrogator and the suspect

• Using an audio-only recording

What is the benefit of using a balanced camera angle in interrogations?

• It makes the suspect appear more guilty

• It has no effect on the outcome

• It increases the conviction rate

• It reduces bias and leads to fairer judgments