Campaigners denied interim interdict in Parliament prorogation legal challenge

The transcript discusses an emergency order related to a legal case about probation, with a court hearing scheduled for Tuesday. The speaker views the delay as a victory, noting no urgency over the weekend due to a prior order. Full arguments on the prorogation of Parliament will be heard, with a suggestion for the Prime Minister to provide an affidavit and be available for cross-examination. The real reason for prorogation is debated, with claims it aims to limit Parliament's ability to prevent a no-deal Brexit.

What is the court's current stance on the emergency order regarding probation?

• The court has postponed the hearing indefinitely.

• The court has dismissed the emergency order.

• The court has ruled in favor of stopping probation.

• The court has not yet made a ruling on the merits of the argument.

Why is there no urgency over the weekend according to the court?

• The petitioner withdrew the case.

• The Prime Minister requested a delay.

• The order states that Parliament cannot be paroled before September 9th.

• The court is closed over the weekend.

What is the petitioner suggesting the Prime Minister should do?

• Provide a sworn affidavit and be available for cross-examination.

• Cancel the prorogation of Parliament.

• Apologize to the court.

• Resign from his position.

What was the Defence Minister's off-camera comment about the prorogation?

• It was to prevent Parliament from stopping a no-deal Brexit.

• It was to prepare for an upcoming election.

• It was to allow for more time to negotiate a deal.

• It was to strengthen the democratic process.

What is the significance of the Prime Minister's affidavit suggestion?

• It highlights transparency in government actions.

• It is a routine procedure in court cases.

• It is a legal requirement for all government officials.

• It is unusual and suggests accountability for the prorogation decision.